Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;275(11):2763-2771.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5040-2. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

Pathological sulcus vocalis: treatment approaches and voice outcomes in 36 patients

Affiliations

Pathological sulcus vocalis: treatment approaches and voice outcomes in 36 patients

Beata Miaśkiewicz et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: This is a retrospective study to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of patients with pathological sulcus vocalis.

Methods: Thirty-six patients with pathological sulcus underwent surgery and in 33 cases were performed additional injection laryngoplasty. The pre- and postoperative evaluation of patients included the GRBAS scale, stroboscopic, and objective acoustic voice assessment. The Voice Handicap Index questionnaire (VHI-30) was also used and the scores were obtained from 33 patients.

Results: The stroboscopic evaluation showed significant improvement of amplitude, mucosal wave, and glottal closure after treatment (p < 0.001). The VHI-30 scores decreased considerably indicating improvement due to the treatment for all aspects measured by VHI (p < 0.05, or p < 0.01). In all domains of GRBAS scale, the differences between preoperative and postoperative assessment were statistically significant (p < 0.001). We observed a significant change in Shim and APQ parameters (p < 0.05). Improvement was also observed in the sAPQ parameter, but it was not statistically significant (p = 0.051). For the remaining acoustic parameters, no changes were observed.

Conclusions: The surgical procedure with supplementary injection laryngoplasty of the vocal folds is a good treatment option for pathological sulcus vocalis. The post-treatment self-assessment indicates the significant improvement in VHI, just as perceptual-acoustic evaluation of voice does. Patients with pathological sulcus frequently present with amplitude disturbances, what explains their significant improvement after treatment.

Keywords: Hyaluronic acid; Injection laryngoplasty; Microlaryngoscopy; Sulcus glottidis; Sulcus vocalis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no funding, financial relationships, or conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bilateral sulcus type 2 (LVS)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bilateral sulcus type 3 (LVS)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Sulcus type 3 of the left vocal fold (LVS). b Same patient (intraoperative view)

References

    1. Bouchayer M, Cornut G, Loire R, Witzig E, Roch JB, Bastian R. Epidermoid cyst, sulci, and mucosal bridges of the true vocal cord: a report of 157 cases. Laryngoscope. 1985;95(9):1087–1094. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198509000-00014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ford CN, Inagi K, Bless DM, Khidr A, Gilchrist KW. Sulcus vocalis: a rational analytical approach to diagnosis and management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105:189–200. doi: 10.1177/000348949610500304. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ishii H, Baba T, Kawabata I. Clinical observations in the sulcus vocalis. J Otolaryngol. 1967;70:911–919.
    1. Shin Y. Clinical and pathological investigations of sulcus vocalis. Otologia (Fukuoka) 1976;22:819–835.
    1. Hsiung MW, Woo P, Wang HW. A clinical classification and histopathological study of sulcus vocalis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257:466–468. doi: 10.1007/s004050000254. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources