Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun;27(6):2003-2020.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5118-9. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Injective mesenchymal stem cell-based treatments for knee osteoarthritis: from mechanisms of action to current clinical evidences

Affiliations
Review

Injective mesenchymal stem cell-based treatments for knee osteoarthritis: from mechanisms of action to current clinical evidences

Silvia Lopa et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) represents a relevant social and economic burden worldwide. "Mesenchymal stem cells" or, as recently proposed, "medicinal signaling cells" (MSCs) have been recently introduced as injective treatments for OA with the aim of restoring joint homeostasis. The aim of this review is to provide the reader with the tools necessary to interpret the currently available clinical data, focusing on the MSC mechanisms of action which might help to clarify what we should expect from this treatment.

Methods: Clinical studies reporting MSC injections for the treatment of knee OA, either freshly isolated or culture-expanded cells, have been included and commented in relation to the supposed therapeutic effect that MSCs might exert giving their supposed mode of actions.

Results: The majority of the studies reports significant improvements in terms of pain and knee function compared to baseline values, up to 24 months of follow-up. Although these data support the expected therapeutic effect of this therapy giving the features of these cells, only 14% of the studies present a control group and more than one-third of them report the results on less than ten patients.

Conclusions: Despite the constant presence of positive and satisfactory results in the studies analyzed, the complexity of MSC metabolism and related therapeutic effects as well as the weakness of most of the studies do not allow withdrawing definitive conclusions about the superiority of one tissue source over another, as well as about the best cell dose and the long-term durability of the effects of these procedures. Given the high potential value of these therapies in the treatment of OA, further studies accurately designed, carefully defining the type of patients to be included and pursuing minimal standard requirements in terms of follow-up, number of patients, and types of measurements should be conducted to finally assess the efficacy of MSC-based injective treatments.

Keywords: Adipose tissue; Articular cartilage; Bone marrow concentrate; Inflammation; Intra-articular injection; Mesenchymal stem cells; Osteoarthritis; Stromal vascular fraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Laura de Girolamo is scientific consultant for Lipogems International S.p.A. The other authors declare that they do not have conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment pathways of MSC-based injective treatments for OA: features of products and donor sources. Progenitor cell concentrates can be considered as one-step approach. In fact, in the case of autologous progenitor cell concentrates (pink), cell/tissue harvesting and patient treatment are performed on the same moment. Allogeneic progenitor cell concentrates (blue), similar to allogeneic in vitro expanded MSCs (green), are “off-the-shelf” products, compatible with a one-step intervention on the patient. The use of autologous expanded MSCs (yellow) is the only treatment that involves a two-step approach, since the patient undergoes cell/tissue harvesting and treatment in two separated moments. Professional illustration by Matilde Bongio, Ph.D., GoArts—IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Synovial, cartilaginous, and bony-derived markers of degradation, synthesis, and inflammation in a joint affected by OA [64]. The paracrine activity of the MSCs in the OA articular environment resides in their anti-inflammatory, anti-catabolic, and trophic abilities. Monitoring of variations in these markers has been proposed as a strategy to evaluate the efficacy of MSC-based OA treatments. Professional illustration by Matilde Bongio, Ph.D., GoArts— IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi

References

    1. Glyn-Jones S, Palmer AJ, Agricola R, Price AJ, Vincent TL, Weinans H, et al. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2015;386:376–387. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60802-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:646–656. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hiligsmann M, Cooper C, Arden N, Boers M, Branco JC, Luisa Brandi M, et al. Health economics in the field of osteoarthritis: an expert’s consensus paper from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;43:303–313. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anandacoomarasamy A, March L. Current evidence for osteoarthritis treatments. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2010;2:17–28. doi: 10.1177/1759720X09359889. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paxton EW, Namba RS, Maletis GB, Khatod M, Yue EJ, Davies M, et al. A prospective study of 80,000 total joint and 5000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in a community-based registry in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(Suppl 2):117–132. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00807. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms