Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;31(1):59-72.
doi: 10.1037/pas0000649. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

The Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI): Assessing transdiagnostic dimensions to validate a profile approach to emotional disorder classification

Affiliations

The Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI): Assessing transdiagnostic dimensions to validate a profile approach to emotional disorder classification

Anthony J Rosellini et al. Psychol Assess. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

There has been limited progress evaluating the validity of dimensional approaches to emotional disorder classification. This has occurred in part because of a lack of standardized assessment tools developed with the specific intent of studying dimensional classification. The goal of the current study was to develop and validate the Multidimensional Emotional Disorder Inventory (MEDI) to efficiently assess nine empirically supported transdiagnostic dimensions proposed in the Brown and Barlow (2009) profile approach to emotional disorder classification: neurotic temperament, positive temperament, depression, autonomic arousal, somatic anxiety, social anxiety, intrusive cognitions, traumatic reexperiencing, and avoidance. The MEDI factor structure, reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity was evaluated in outpatients with emotional disorders (pilot sample = 227; validation sample = 780). The final 9-factor solution fit the data well. Intercorrelations among MEDI factors were consistent with previous research, and all MEDI dimensions had acceptable reliability. Correlations with common self-report questionnaires and DSM-5 diagnoses supported the convergent/discriminant validity of all nine MEDI dimensions. Collectively, these results support the use of 49-item MEDI in clinical research samples. The MEDI should be used in future research to evaluate the validity of the Brown and Barlow (2009) approach to emotional disorder classification. Because it provides an efficient assessment of several well-established emotional disorder traits and phenotypes, the MEDI also may have utility for general research or clinical purposes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abramowitz JS, Brigidi BD, & Foa EB (1999). Health concerns in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 529–539. - PubMed
    1. Abramowitz JS, & Deacon BJ (2006). Psychometric properties and construct validity of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory--Revised: Replication and extension with a clinical sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 1016–1035. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antony MM, Orsillo SM, & Roemer L (2001). Practitioner’s guide to empirically based measures of anxiety New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
    1. American Psychiatric Assocation. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
    1. Barnett JH, Huang J, Perlis RH, Young MM, Rosenbaum JF, Nierenberg AA, . . . Smoller JW (2011). Personality and bipolar disorder: dissecting state and trait associations between mood and personality. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1593–1604. doi:10.1017/S0033291710002333 - DOI - PMC - PubMed