Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018;27(6):555-561.
doi: 10.1159/000493362. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

The Relevance of the Second Cesarean Delivery in the Reduction of Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Relevance of the Second Cesarean Delivery in the Reduction of Institutional Cesarean Delivery Rates

Michael F E Diejomaoh et al. Med Princ Pract. 2018.

Abstract

Objective: The cesarean delivery rate has increased worldwide. The aim of our study was to assess the events associated with the second cesarean deliveries in our institution.

Subjects and methods: All cesarean deliveries at the Maternity Hospital, Kuwait, from January 1 to December 31, 2013, were identified. A comparative study was undertaken on patients having their first and second cesarean deliveries. The social and clinical characteristics of these patients were extracted from our records and the antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum course of the pregnancies and their outcomes documented.

Results: During the study period, 10,586 deliveries were recorded, including 3,676 cesarean deliveries, i.e., a cesarean delivery rate of 34.7%. 840 of these patients were undergoing their first cesarean delivery (group A) and 607 patients were undergoing their second (group B); 484 patients from group A and 341 patients from group B with complete records were analyzed. Mean age (30.89 ± 4.93 vs. 29.94 ± 5.56 years, p = 0.008), parity (1.49 ± 1.22 vs. 0.98 ± 1.60, p < 0.0001), gestational age at delivery (38.12 ± 2.61 vs. 37.66 ± 3.11 weeks, p = 0.02), and fetal birth weight (3,211.60 ± 691.51 vs. 2,829.73 ± 863.26 g, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in group B than in group A. 53.2% of the patients in group B requested repeat cesarean delivery, their second cesarean. The rate of maternal morbidity was low.

Conclusions: The incidence of repeat cesarean delivery in group B is high, and its reduction should contribute to a lowering of the overall cesarean delivery rate.

Keywords: Cesarean section; Delivery; Electronic fetal monitoring; Maternal morbidity and mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJK, Wilson EC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61:1–71. - PubMed
    1. Timofeev J, Reddy UM, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Landy HJ, Laughon SK. Obstetric complications, neonatal morbidity, and indications for cesarean delivery by maternal age. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1184–1195. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenstein MG, Kuppermann M, Gregorich SE, Cottrell EK, Caughey AB, Cheng YW. Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1010–1017. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ, Births: Preliminary Data for 2011 National Vital Statistics Reports. Hyattsville, National Center for Health Statistics. 2012;vol 61(No 5) - PubMed
    1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spongy CY, Dushe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, Sheffield JS. ed 24. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2014. William Obstetrics; pp. pp 587–621.

Publication types