Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 30;18(1):96.
doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1248-y.

Characterization and anti-salmonella activities of lactic acid bacteria isolated from cattle faeces

Affiliations

Characterization and anti-salmonella activities of lactic acid bacteria isolated from cattle faeces

Adewale Adetoye et al. BMC Microbiol. .

Abstract

Background: Non typhoidal salmonellosis is one of the neglected zoonoses in most African countries. The use of sub-therapeutic doses of antibiotics as animal growth promoter enhances the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria with food animal reservoirs and may also results in antibiotics residue in animal products. One promising alternative to antibiotics in animal feed is Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) as probiotics. This study was carried out to determine the anti-salmonella activities and suitability of LAB isolated from cattle faeces in Nigeria as potential probiotics in cattle feed.

Method: The test Salmonella enterica spp strains and LAB were isolated from cattle faeces and identified by MALDI-TOF MS and partial sequencing of 16S rRNA genes respectively. The anti-salmonella activities of the isolated LAB in co-culture, cell-free supernatant, inhibition of growth by viable LAB cells and quantification of organic acids were determined by standard techniques. The ability of the LAB strains to withstand gastric conditions, antibiotic susceptibility and their haemolytic ability on blood agar were also determined.

Results: A total of 88 LAB belonging to 15 species were isolated and identified from cattle faeces. The most abundant species were Streptococcus infantarius (26), Enterococcus hirae (12), Lactobacillus amylovorus (10), Lactobacillus mucosae (10) and Lactobacillus ingluviei (9). Most of the LAB strains showed good anti-salmonella activities against the test Salmonella enterica spp. with 2 Lactobacillus strains; Lactobacillus amylovorus C94 and Lactobacillus salivarius C86 exhibiting remarkable anti-salmonella activities with total inhibition of Salmonella spp after 18 hours of co-incubation. The selected strains were able to survive simultaneous growth at pH 3 and 7% bile concentration and are non hemolytic.

Conclusion: This study reports the vast diversity of culturable LAB in cattle faeces from Nigeria and their putative in-vitro antibacterial activity against Salmonella enterica spp isolated from cattle. Lactobacillus amylovorus C94 and Lactobacillus salivarius C86 demonstrated promising probiotic potentials in-vitro and will be further tested in-vivo in animal field trial.

Keywords: Cattle; Faeces; Lactic acid bacteria; Probiotics; Salmonella.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest on this study.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Circular phylogenetic tree based on the neighbor-joining method of 16S rRNA genes sequences of the isolated LAB and the outgroup was Salmonella enterica spp constructed using MEGA version 6. The scale bar represents 0.1-nucleotide substitutes per position
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolated lactic acid bacteria. S represents susceptible. R represents resistance
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concentration (mg/ml) of organic acid produced by selected LAB strains isolated from cattle faeces. a indicates yield of lactic acid. b indicates yield of acetic acid. c indicates yield of propionic acid
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kill Kinetics of two Salmonella enterica strains in co-culture with Lactobacillus salivarius C86 and Lactobacillus amylovorus C94. a represents Salmonella enterica strain S1 (control). b represents Salmonella enterica S1 and Lactobacillus salivarius C86. c represents Salmonella enterica S1 and Lactobacillus amylovorus C94. d represents Salmonella enterica strain S57 (control). e represents Salmonella enterica S57 and Lactobacillus salivarius C86. f represents Salmonella enterica S57 and Lactobacillus amylovorus C94

References

    1. McEwen SA, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:S93–106. doi: 10.1086/340246. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Food and Agriculture Organization / World Health Organization. Expert Workshop on Non-Human Antimicrobial Usage and Antimicrobial Resistance: Scientific assessment Geneva. December 1 – 5. 2003
    1. Angulo FJ, Johnson KR, Tauxe RV, Cohen ML. Origins and consequences of antimicrobial-resistant nontyphoidal Salmonella: implications for the use of fluoroquinolones in food animals. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2000;6:77–83. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.77. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Das JK, Mishra D, Ray P, Tripathy P, Beuria TK, Singh N, et al. In vitro evaluation of anti-infective activity of a Lactobacillus plantarum strain against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Gut Pathogens. 2013;5:11–13. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Majowicz SE, Musto J, Scallan E, Angulo FJ, Kirk M, O’Brien SJ, et al. The global burden of nontyphoidal Salmonella gastroenteritis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:882–889. doi: 10.1086/650733. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms