Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes
- PMID: 30166065
- PMCID: PMC6908441
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.015
Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing financial interests with respect to this manuscript, or its content, or subject matter.
The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
References
-
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ: GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2011, 64(4):395–400. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong R, Waters E, Jackson N, Oliver S, Popay J, Shepherd J, Petticrew M, Anderson L, Bailie R, Brunton G et al.: Guidelines for Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions, vol. 2 Melbourne University: Australia; 2007.
-
- Higgins J, Green S: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011) http://handbook.cochrane.org/ [accessed 3 February 2013]. 2011.
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources