The allocation of time and risk of Lyme: A case of ecosystem service income and substitution effects
- PMID: 30166775
- PMCID: PMC6110530
- DOI: 10.1007/s10640-017-0142-7
The allocation of time and risk of Lyme: A case of ecosystem service income and substitution effects
Abstract
Forests are often touted for their ecosystem services, including outdoor recreation. Historically forests were a source of danger and were avoided. Forests continue to be reservoirs for infectious diseases and their vectors - a disservice. We examine how this disservice undermines the potential recreational services by measuring the human response to environmental risk using exogenous variation in the risk of contracting Lyme Disease. We find evidence that individuals substitute away from spending time outdoors when there is greater risk of Lyme Disease infection. Individuals facing a higher risk of infection substitute away from outdoor leisure. On average individuals spent 1.54 fewer minutes outdoors at the average, 72 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), confirmed cases of Lyme Disease. We estimate lost outdoor recreation of 9.41 hours per year per person in an average county in the North Eastern United States and an aggregate welfare loss on the order $2.8 billion to $5.0 billion per year.
Keywords: Adaptation; American Time Use Survey (ATUS); Economic-Epidemiology; Resource allocation; Risk; travel cost.
Figures


References
-
- Allan BF, Keesing F, Ostfeld RS. Effect of forest fragmentation on Lyme disease risk. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:267–272.
-
- Arellano M, Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud. 1991;58:277–297.
-
- Arellano M, Bover O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom. 1995;68:29–51.
-
- ATUS. American Time Use Survey. 2015.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources