Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 21;4(1):e000393.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000393. eCollection 2018.

Exercise training and physiological responses to acute stress: study protocol and methodological considerations of a randomised controlled trial

Elin Arvidson  1   2 , Anna Sjörs Dahlman  1 , Mats Börjesson  2   3 , Lennart Gullstrand  2 , Ingibjörg H Jonsdottir  1   2
Affiliations

Exercise training and physiological responses to acute stress: study protocol and methodological considerations of a randomised controlled trial

Elin Arvidson et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. .

Abstract

Background: This paper describes the protocol and methodological prerequisites for a randomised controlled exercise intervention. Selected baseline data from the study are also presented, demonstrating some methodological challenges related to exercise intervention trials. The aim of the trial was to study the effects of exercise training on physiological responses to acute psychosocial stress in untrained individuals.

Methods: Individuals with a low level of physical activity were invited to participate in an exercise intervention lasting for 6 months. A total of 119 participants were included and went through a peak oxygen uptake test and a psychosocial stress test at baseline. Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol were measured in connection to the stress test to identify the physiological response.

Results: Almost 90% of the participants reported themselves as untrained, but results from the objectively measured oxygen uptake did not seem to correspond to the reported sedentary lifestyle. The primary outcome measures at baseline varied between individuals. The mean change from pre-test to peak value was 214% for ACTH and 94% for cortisol. Of these, 13 individuals did not respond in ACTH and/or and cortisol.

Discussion: Supposedly untrained individuals seeking participation in an exercise intervention might not be as untrained as they report, a methodological consideration of importance when evaluating the effects of training. Another important consideration is related to the primary outcome measure, which should be measurable and possible to affect. Absence of reaction at baseline means that changes can only be detected as an increased reaction.

Keywords: longitudinal study; physical activity; psychosocial stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study enrolment and intervention allocation. ATSI, Acute Stress and exercise Training Intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol to the psychosocial stress test.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charlton GA, Crawford MH. Physiologic consequences of training. Cardiol Clin 1997;15:345–54. 10.1016/S0733-8651(05)70344-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szostak J, Laurant P. The forgotten face of regular physical exercise: a ‘natural’ anti-atherogenic activity. Clin Sci 2011;121:91–106. 10.1042/CS20100520 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duman RS. Neurotrophic factors and regulation of mood: role of exercise, diet and metabolism. Neurobiol Aging 2005;26(Suppl 1):88–93. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.08.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenwinkel ET, Bloomfield DM, Arwady MA, et al. . Exercise and autonomic function in health and cardiovascular disease. Cardiol Clin 2001;19:369–87. 10.1016/S0733-8651(05)70223-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunn AL, Trivedi MH, Kampert JB, et al. . Exercise treatment for depression: efficacy and dose response. Am J Prev Med 2005;28:1–8. 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.003 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources