Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 28:3:6.
doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0050-6. eCollection 2018.

Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research

Olena Hankivsky  1 , Kristen W Springer  2 , Gemma Hunting  3
Affiliations

Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research

Olena Hankivsky et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Understanding sex and gender in health research can improve the quality of scholarship and enhance health outcomes. Funding agencies and academic journals are two key gatekeepers of knowledge production and dissemination, including whether and how sex/gender is incorporated into health research. Though attention has been paid to key issues and practices in accounting for sex/gender in health funding agencies and academic journals, to date, there has been no systematic analysis documenting whether and how agencies and journals require attention to sex/gender, what conceptual explanations and practical guidance are given for such inclusion, and whether existing practices reflect the reality that sex/gender cannot be separated from other axes of inequality.

Methods: Our research systematically examines official statements about sex/gender inclusion from 45 national-level funding agencies that fund health research across 36 countries (covering the regions of the EU and associated countries, North America, and Australia) and from ten top-ranking general health (the top five in "science" and the top five in "social science") and ten sex- and/or gender-related health journals. We explore the extent to which agencies and journals require inclusion of sex/gender considerations and to what extent existing strategies reflect state of the art understandings of sex/gender, including intersectional perspectives.

Results: The research highlights the following: (a) there is no consistency in whether sex/gender are mentioned in funding and publishing guidelines; (b) there is wide variation in how sex/gender are conceptualized and how researchers are asked to address the inclusion/exclusion of sex/gender in research; (c) funding agencies tend to prioritize male/female equality in research teams and funding outcomes over considerations of sex/gender in research content and knowledge production; and (d) with very few exceptions, agency and journal criteria fail to recognize the complexity of sex/gender, including the intersection of sex/gender with other key factors that shape health.

Conclusions: The conceptualization and integration of sex/gender needs to better capture the interacting and complex factors that shape health-an imperative that can be informed by an intersectional approach. This can strengthen current efforts to advance scientific excellence in the production and reporting of research. We provide recommendations and supporting questions to strengthen consideration of sex/gender in policies and practices of health journals and funding agencies.

Keywords: Funding agencies; Gender; Health; Health journals; Intersectionality; Knowledge generation; Policy; Scientific reporting; Sex differences; Sex/gender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Health journal search
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Funding agency search
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Considerations of sex/gender and diversity by country
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ritz SA, Antle DM, Côté J, Deroy K, Fraleigh N, Messing K, et al. First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. Feder Am Soc Exp Biol. 2014;28:4–13. - PubMed
    1. Hawkes S, Buse K. Gender and global health: evidence, policy, and inconvenient truths. Lancet. 2013;381:1783–1787. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60253-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pinn VW. Women’s health research: current state of the art. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013;2:8–10. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.063. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geller S, Pomeroy C, Thomas PA. Women's health research: road map to the future. Glob Adv Health Med. 2013;2:5–6. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.069. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharman Z, Johnson J. Towards the inclusion of gender and sex in health research and funding: an institutional perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1812–1816. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.039. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources