Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 17:7:352.
doi: 10.4102/ajod.v7i0.352. eCollection 2018.

Preferred rehabilitation setting among stroke survivors in Nigeria and associated personal factors

Affiliations

Preferred rehabilitation setting among stroke survivors in Nigeria and associated personal factors

Grace Vincent-Onabajo et al. Afr J Disabil. .

Abstract

Background: Incorporating patients' preferences in the care they receive is an important component of evidence-based practice and patient-centred care.

Objective: This study assessed stroke patients' preferences regarding rehabilitation settings.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to examine preferences of stroke patients receiving physiotherapy at three hospitals in Northern Nigeria. Personal factors and preferred rehabilitation setting data were obtained using the Modified Rankin Scale (to assess global disability) and a researcher-developed questionnaire. Associations between preferences and personal factors were explored using bivariate statistics.

Results: Sixty stroke patients whose mean age was 53.6 ± 14.8 years participated in the study. Most of the participants (38.3%) preferred an outpatient setting, 19 (31.7%) preferred rehabilitation in their homes, 14 chose inpatient rehabilitation (23.3%), while 4 (6.7%) preferred the community. Age and source of finance were significantly associated with preferences. The majority (66.7%) of those aged ≥ 65 years expressed a preference for rehabilitation in the home or community (X2 = 6.80; p = 0.03). Similarly, most of the participants (53.3%) who depended on family finances preferred home- or community-based rehabilitation, while most of those who depended on employment income for finances preferred an outpatient rehabilitation setting (X2 = 16.80; p = 0.01).

Conclusion: A preference for rehabilitation in outpatient facilities predominated followed by home-based rehabilitation, and preferences varied based on age and source of finance. These variations in preferences have implications for making rehabilitation decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Rehabilitation setting preferences.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AL-Oraibi S., Dawson V.L., Balloch S. & Moore A., 2011, ‘Rehabilitation services for persons affected by stroke in Jordan’, Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development 22, 73–84.
    1. Banks J.L. & Marotta C.A., 2007, ‘Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: Implications for stroke clinical trials. A literature review and synthesis’, Stroke 38, 1091–1096. 10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.23810.c6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brazier J.E., Dixon S. & Ratcliffe J., 2009, ‘The role of patient preferences in cost-effectiveness analysis: A conflict of values?’, Pharmacoeconomics 27, 705–712. 10.2165/11314840-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan L., Sandel M.E., Jette A.M., Appelman J., Brandt D.E., Cheng P. et al. , 2013, ‘Does postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke’, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 94, 622–629. 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.09.033 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan L., Wang H., Terdiman J., Hoffman J., Ciol M.A., Lattimore B.F. et al. , 2009, ‘Disparities in outpatient and home health service utilization following stroke: Results of a 9-year cohort study in Northern California’, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1, 997–1003. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.09.019 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources