Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis
- PMID: 30167471
- PMCID: PMC6109946
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000190
Improving access to Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP): the 2-week wait for cancer comes to psychosis
Abstract
Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to rapidly initiate specialist packages of care for those people newly experiencing symptoms. The intention of such rapid engagement is to mitigate the negative effects of a prolonged duration of untreated psychosis. Aiming to achieve a 'parity of esteem' between mental and physical health, a new target was introduced by the National Health Service (NHS) England, where 50% of new referrals were expected to receive a concordant package of care within 2 weeks from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. A baseline assessment in late 2014 found that just 21% of all referrals received and accepted met this target within the EIP Team for the North-East London NHS Foundation Trust. This project sought to improve the team's performance, seeking input from all team members and using an iterative process with the primary aim of meeting the target ahead of its roll-out. It was determined that the relatively high number of inappropriate referrals (34% at baseline) is a key causative agent in delaying staff from processing eligible cases in a timely fashion. These are defined as referrals which do not meet basic eligibility criteria such as no previous treatment for psychosis. Interventions were therefore designed targeting three domains of improving staff awareness of the new target, improving efficiency by changing the case allocation process and improving the referral pathway for external sources. The impact of these changes was re-evaluated over two cycles beyond baseline. By the final cycle, 62% of new referrals were seen within 2 weeks, while inappropriate referrals declined to just 3%. The multi-interventional nature of this project limits its generalisability and further work should be carried out to identify those changes that were most impactful. Nevertheless, focused targeting of the referral pathway may prove to be of benefit to other EIP services struggling with lengthy wait times.
Keywords: audit and feedback; control charts/run charts; management; mental health; quality improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Implementing the access and waiting time standard for early intervention in psychosis in the United Kingdom: An evaluation of referrals and post-assessment outcomes over the first year of operation.Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;12(5):979-986. doi: 10.1111/eip.12548. Epub 2018 Mar 26. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29582556
-
Predictors of positive outcomes from 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': protocol for a national retrospective cohort study.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 3;14:1274820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1274820. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 38025474 Free PMC article.
-
Economic impact of early intervention in psychosis services: results from a longitudinal retrospective controlled study in England.BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 20;6(10):e012611. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012611. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27798015 Free PMC article.
-
The over-35s: early intervention in psychosis services entering uncharted territory.BJPsych Bull. 2018 Aug;42(4):137-140. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2018.28. Epub 2018 May 24. BJPsych Bull. 2018. PMID: 29792245 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of a New Triage and Booking System on Renal Clinic Wait Times.Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 Jun 2;7:2054358120924140. doi: 10.1177/2054358120924140. eCollection 2020. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020. PMID: 32547773 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of delay to and length of stay with early intervention for psychosis service: findings from the CRIS-FEP study.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Jan;59(1):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02522-z. Epub 2023 Jun 23. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 37353580 Free PMC article.
-
Three-year outcomes and predictors for full recovery in patients with early-stage psychosis.Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022 Oct 27;8(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41537-022-00301-4. Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022. PMID: 36302861 Free PMC article.
-
The potential of digital behavioural tests as a diagnostic aid for psychosis.PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Sep 15;2(9):e0000339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000339. eCollection 2023 Sep. PLOS Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37713385 Free PMC article.
-
Associations between rural/urban status, duration of untreated psychosis and mode of onset of psychosis: a mental health electronic clinical records analysis in the East of England, UK.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jun;60(6):1323-1334. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02758-3. Epub 2024 Sep 9. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 39251413 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the effects of national initiatives to improve the physical health of people with psychosis in England: secondary analysis of data from the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis.BJPsych Bull. 2022 Jun;46(3):140-147. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2021.38. BJPsych Bull. 2022. PMID: 33949302 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Update on Duration of Untreated Psychosis; it’s impact on outcome, and finding ways to it’s reduction : Wunderink L, Birchwood M, Schizophrenia Research: Elsevier, 2010.
-
- Guidance to support the introduction of access and waiting time standards for mental health services in 2015/16: NHS England. 2015. https://www.england.nhs.uk/2015/02/mh-standards/
-
- Delivering cancer waiting times: a good practice guide: NHS Improvement. 2016. https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/delivering-cancer-waiting-times-goo...
-
- Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2015. [Quality standard [QS80] https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs80 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous