Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 21;7(3):e000319.
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000319. eCollection 2018.

Knowledge translation and process improvement interventions increased pain assessment documentation in a large quaternary paediatric post-anaesthesia care unit

Affiliations

Knowledge translation and process improvement interventions increased pain assessment documentation in a large quaternary paediatric post-anaesthesia care unit

Daniel Stocki et al. BMJ Open Qual. .

Abstract

Background: Due to inadequate pain assessment documentation in our paediatric post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU), we were unable to monitor pain intensity, and target factors contributing to moderate and severe postoperative pain in children. The purpose of this study was to improve pain assessment documentation in PACU through a process improvement intervention and knowledge translation (KT) strategy. The study was set in a PACU within a large university affiliated paediatric hospital. Participants included PACU and Acute Pain Service nursing staff, administrative staff and anaesthesiologists.

Methods: The Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement was used. Benchmark data were obtained by chart review of 99 patient medical records prior to interventions. Data included pain assessment documentation (pain intensity score, use of validated pain intensity measure) during PACU stay. Repeat chart audit took place at 4, 5 and 6 months after the intervention.

Intervention: Key informant interviews were conducted to identify barriers to pain assessment documentation. A process improvement was implemented whereby the PACU flowsheets were modified to facilitate pain assessment documentation. KT strategy was implemented to increase awareness of pain assessment documentation and to provide the knowledge, skill and judgement to support this practice. The KT strategy was directed at PACU nursing staff and comprised education outreach (educational meetings for PACU nurses, discussions at daily huddles), reminders (screensavers, bedside posters, email reminders) and feedback of audit results.

Results: The proportion of charts that included at least one documented pain assessment was 69%. After intervention, pain assessment documentation increased to >90% at 4 and 5 months, respectively, and to 100% after 6 months.

Conclusion: After implementing process improvement and KT interventions, pain assessment documentation improved. Additional work is needed in several key areas, specifically monitoring moderate to severe pain, in order to target factors contributing to significant postoperative pain in children.

Keywords: audit and feedback; paediatrics; pain; pdsa; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Audit data collection sheet. FLACC, Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability; NRS, numerical rating score; PACU, post-anaesthesia care unit; PIPP, premature pain profile; QIP, quality improvement plan.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fishbone diagram. CIP, continous improvement project; PACU, post-anaesthesia care unit; PDSA, Plan–Do–Study Act.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Feedback report. CIP, continous improvement project; FLACC, Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability; NRC, National Research Corporation; NRS, numerical rating score; PACU, post-anaesthesia care unit; SK, Sick Kids.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Benchmark audit pain score documentation, July 2013.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Benchmark audit pain tool documentation, July 2013.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Reaudit pain measure documentation, November 2013 to January 2014. FLACC, Face-Legs-Activity-Cry-Consolability; med, medium; NRS, numerical rating score.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Reaudit pain score documentation, November 2013 to January 2014.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Benchmark audit prevalence of moderate to severe pain, July 2013.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Reaudit prevalence of moderate to severe pain, November 2013 to January 2014.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Taylor EM, Boyer K, Campbell FA. Pain in hospitalized children: a prospective cross-sectional survey of pain prevalence, intensity, assessment and management in a Canadian pediatric teaching hospital. Pain Res Manag 2008;13:25–32. 10.1155/2008/478102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Power NM, Howard RF, Wade AM, et al. . Pain and behaviour changes in children following surgery. Arch Dis Child 2012;97:879–84. 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301378 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trudeau JD, Lamb E, Gowans M, et al. . A prospective audit of postoperative pain control in pediatric patients. Aorn J 2009;90:531–42. 10.1016/j.aorn.2009.05.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunwoody CJ, Krenzischek DA, Pasero C, et al. . Assessment, physiological monitoring, and consequences of inadequately treated acute pain. J Perianesth Nurs 2008;23(1 Suppl):S15–27. 10.1016/j.jopan.2007.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367:1618–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources