Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 1;59(10):4292-4298.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24142.

Statistical Model of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Parameters That Correlate With Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy

Affiliations

Statistical Model of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Parameters That Correlate With Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy

Mohammed Ashraf et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether combining quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters can achieve high sensitivity and specificity to distinguish eyes with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) from those with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) as well as eyes with diabetes and no DR (NoDR) from those with clinical DR (any DR).

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 28 eyes (17 patients) with NoDR, 54 eyes (34 patients) with NPDR, and 56 eyes (36 patients) with PDR. OCTA images were processed to quantify the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, acircularity, vessel density, skeletonized vessel density, fractal dimension, and intersections and average vessel diameter for the superficial (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP). Binary logistic regression models were used to identify the OCTA parameters that best distinguished DR severity groups. The area (AUC) under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each model.

Results: The regression model identified the SCP FAZ area, DCP vessel density, and acircularity as parameters that best distinguished between DR severity groups. ROC curves for NPDR versus PDR had an AUC of 0.845 (P < 0.001) and sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 70%, respectively. ROC curves for NoDR versus any DR showed an AUC of 0.946 (P < 0.001) with sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 96%, with comparable results when explored in males and females separately.

Conclusions: We identified a set of OCTA parameters with high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between groups based on DR severity, suggesting potential clinical application for OCTA as a screening tool for DR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the combined parameter binary regression model. Upper row shows the ROC curves for eyes with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) versus proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Lower row shows the ROC curve for eyes with no diabetic retinopathy (DR) versus those with any DR. SE, sensitivity; SP, specificity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jia Y, Tan O, Tokayer J, et al. Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2012;20:4710–4725. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park JJ, Soetikno BT, Fawzi AA. Characterization of the middle capillary plexus using optical coherence tomography angiography in healthy and diabetic eyes. Retina. 2016;36:2039–2050. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan CS, Lim LW, Chow VS, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography evaluation of the parafoveal vasculature and its relationship with ocular factors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:OCT224–OCT234. - PubMed
    1. Zahid S, Dolz-Marco R, Freund KB, et al. Fractal dimensional analysis of optical coherence tomography angiography in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:4940–4947. - PubMed
    1. Bhanushali D, Anegondi N, Gadde SG, et al. Linking retinal microvasculature features with severity of diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:OCT519–OCT525. - PubMed

Publication types