Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;22(1):1-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0868-0. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma

C Mariette et al. Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jan.
Free article

Erratum in

Abstract

Background and aims: Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer (GC) are changing, especially in the West with a decreasing incidence of distal, intestinal-type tumours and the corresponding increasing proportion of tumours with Laurén diffuse or WHO poorly cohesive (PC) including signet ring cell (SRC) histology. To accurately assess the behaviour and the prognosis of these GC subtypes, the standardization of pathological definitions is needed.

Methods: A multidisciplinary expert team belonging to the European Chapter of International Gastric Cancer Association (IGCA) identified 11 topics on pathological classifications used for PC and SRC GC. The topics were debated during a dedicated Workshop held in Verona in March 2017. Then, through a Delphi method, consensus statements for each topic were elaborated.

Results: A consensus was reached on the need to classify gastric carcinoma according to the most recent edition of the WHO classification which is currently WHO 2010. Moreover, to standardize the definition of SRC carcinomas, the proposal that only WHO PC carcinomas with more than 90% poorly cohesive cells having signet ring cell morphology have to be classified as SRC carcinomas was made. All other PC non-SRC types have to be further subdivided into PC carcinomas with SRC component (< 90% but > 10% SRCs) and PC carcinomas not otherwise specified (< 10% SRCs).

Conclusion: The reported statements clarify some debated topics on pathological classifications used for PC and SRC GC. As such, this consensus classification would allow the generation of evidence on biological and prognostic differences between these GC subtypes.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Poorly cohesive sub-type; Signet ring cell histology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 2003 Oct 1;98(7):1521-30 - PubMed
    1. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004 Jul;128(7):765-70 - PubMed
    1. Virchows Arch. 2008 May;452(5):525-34 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 2009 May;41(5):427-32 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Jul;18(7):1945-52 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms