Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 May;33(5):1376-1385.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6412-9. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

Effect of ilaprazole on the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcer: randomized-controlled, multicenter study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of ilaprazole on the healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced gastric ulcer: randomized-controlled, multicenter study

Chang Seok Bang et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment regimen or the duration of treatment for an endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced gastric ulcer has not been established. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of novel proton-pump inhibitor, ilaprazole, for the treatment of ESD-induced gastric ulcer.

Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, randomized multicenter study. Between June 2015 and March 2018, a total of 176 patients (178 lesions) who underwent ESD for a gastric neoplasm were randomly allocated to receive the oral proton-pump inhibitor ilaprazole 20 mg or rabeprazole 20 mg daily for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the ulcer healing rate at 4 and 8 weeks.

Results: A total of 155 (157 lesions) and 154 patients (156 lesions) were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol analyses, respectively. There was no significant difference in the ulcer healing rate (ilaprazole vs. rabeprazole, 97.4% vs. 97.0 p = 0.78 at 4 weeks, 100% vs. 100%, p = 0.95 at 8 weeks in the mITT analysis) or stage of ulcer (scar stage, 25.6% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.25 at 4 weeks, 92.3% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.59 at 8 weeks in the mITT analysis) between the treatment groups. The quality of ulcer healing was not significantly different between the two groups. No independent predictive factor for higher-quality ulcer healing was found in the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: According to this trial, ilaprazole and rabeprazole showed no significant difference in the healing of artificial gastric ulcers. Most of the ulcers achieved complete healing within 4-8 weeks.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02638584.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Endoscopy; Gastric ulcer; Ilaprazole; Rabeprazole.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dig Endosc. 2017 Jan;29(1):57-64 - PubMed
    1. Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-23 - PubMed
    1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;36(7):627-34 - PubMed
    1. Jpn Clin Med. 2013 Mar 06;4:7-13 - PubMed
    1. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Nov 16;8(19):716-722 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources