Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Aug 28;109(4):308-315.
doi: 10.23749/mdl.v109i4.7245.

Trend analysis and factors associated with biological injuries among health care workers in Southern Italy

Affiliations
Observational Study

Trend analysis and factors associated with biological injuries among health care workers in Southern Italy

Vincenza Cofini et al. Med Lav. .

Abstract

Background: Biological injuries are the most common and serious among health care workers.

Objectives: This study aims to estimate the injuries' incidence, job distribution and temporal trend in a hospital in Southern Italy.

Methods: Data on accidents, collected from January 2010 to December 2016, were analyzed. Poisson distribution was used to calculate incidence rates and respective 95% confidence intervals. Trends were analyzed using the Joinpoint regression model. A multiple logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with injuries.

Results: Three hundred and thirty-five injuries were reported from 2010 to 2016, occurring mainly in the morning (54%) and frequently caused by needlestick (70%). We observed a significant decline in the incidence rates of the total amount of injuries (ACP=-11.3; 95% CI: -16.3 - -5.9), for nurses (ACP=-15.7; 95% CI: -24.3 - -6.2) and for health and social care assistants (ACP=-13.2; 95% CI: -23.1 - -2.0). Among male physicians the risk of biological accident was higher than female physicians (OR=3.67; 95% CI:1.9-7.1), while among male nurses the risk was lower than among female nurses (OR=0.31; 95% CI: 0.17-0.59). For the nursing category, "afternoon" and "night" represented risk factors with OR=2.19 (95% CI: 1.2-3.7) and OR=8.8 (95% CI: 3.4-22.8) respectively. For physicians, surgical intervention was a risk factor (OR=7.71; 95% CI: 3.2-18.4).

Conclusions: Our findings confirm the need for continuous monitoring and improved control of work-related exposures, both for health and the associated costs.

«Analisi temporale e fattori associati a infortuni biologici tra gli operatori sanitari del Sud Italia».

Introduzione:: Gli incidenti a rischio biologico sono i più comuni ed i più gravi tra gli operatori sanitari, con un’incidenza in Italia di 100.000 infortuni l’anno.

Obiettivi:: Investigare gli infortuni con rischio biologico in un ospedale del Sud Italia.

Metodi:: I tassi di incidenza e gli intervalli di confidenza al 95%, sono stati da calcolati con distribuzione di Poisson, da gennaio 2010 a dicembre 2016. La regressione Joinpoint è stata utilizzata per l’analisi dei trend, la regressione logistica multipla per identificare i fattori associati agli infortuni.

Risultati:: Nel periodo considerato sono stati segnalati 335 infortuni, verificatisi principalmente durante la degenza, al mattino (54%) e causati da aghi (70%). Abbiamo osservato un calo significativo dei tassi di incidenza totali (ACP=-11,3; IC 95%: -16,3 - -5,9), tra gli infermieri (ACP=-15,7; IC 95%: -24.3 - -6.2) e tra gli assistenti socio-sanitari (ACP=-13,2; IC 95%: -23,1 - -2,0). Tra i medici il rischio di incidente è più alto tra gli uomini (OR=3,67; IC 95%: 1,9-7,1), tra gli infermieri il rischio è più basso di quello delle infermiere (OR=0,31; IC 95%: 0,17-0,59). Per gli infermieri,pomeriggio enotte rappresentano i fattori di rischio (rispettivamente OR=2,19; IC 95%: 1,2-3,7; e OR=8,8; IC 95%: 3,4-22,8). Per i medici, l’intervento chirurgico rappresenta un fattore di rischio (OR=7,71; IC 95%: 3,2-18,4).

Conclusioni:: Il monitoraggio continuo ed un migliore controllo delle esposizioni appare necessario, sia per la prevenzione della salute sia per i costi degli infortuni.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Injuries trend during the study period 2010-2016 (crude rate*100 person-years): ACP 11.27 (p<0.01)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence rate (x100 person-years) for personnel employed in SS Filippo e Nicola Hospital (2010-2016)

References

    1. Afridi AA, Kumar A, Sayani R. Needle stick injuries-risk and preventive factors: a study among health care workers in tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. Glob J Health Sci. 2013;5:85–92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergamini M, Cucchi A, Stefanati A, et al. Knowledge of preventive measures against occupational risks and spread of healthcare-associated infections among nursing students. An epidemiological prevalence study from Ferrara, Italy. J Prev Med Hyg. 2009;50:96–101. - PubMed
    1. Chalya PL, Seni J, Mushi MF, et al. Needle-stick injuries and splash exposures among health-care workers at a tertiary care hospital in north-western Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research. 2015:17.
    1. Chambers A, Mustard CA, Etches J. Trends in needle-stick injury incidence following regulatory change in Ontario, Canada (2004-2012): an observational study. Bmc Health Services Research. 2015:15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corrao CR, Mazzotta A, La Torre G, et al. Biological risk and occupational health. Ind Health. 2012;50:326–337. - PubMed

Publication types