Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 12;74(8):1265-1270.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly205.

Multimorbidity Patterns, Frailty, and Survival in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Affiliations

Multimorbidity Patterns, Frailty, and Survival in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Quoc Dinh Nguyen et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty and multimorbidity are independent prognostic factors for mortality, but their interaction has not been fully explored. We investigated the importance of multimorbidity patterns in older adults with the same level of frailty phenotype.

Methods: In a cohort of 7,197 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older, physical frailty status (robust, pre-frail, frail) was defined using shrinking, exhaustion, inactivity, slowness, and weakness. Latent class analysis was used to identify individuals with multimorbidity patterns based on 10 self-reported chronic conditions. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and incidence rate differences (IRDs) for mortality comparing multimorbidity patterns within each frailty state.

Results: Five multimorbidity classes were identified: minimal disease (24.7%), cardiovascular disease (29.0%), osteoarticular disease (27.3%), neuropsychiatric disease (8.9%), and high multisystem morbidity (10.0%). Within each frailty state, the mortality rate per 1,000 person-years over 4 years was greatest in the neuropsychiatric class and lowest in the minimal disease class: robust (56.3 vs 15.7; HR, 2.11 [95% CI: 1.05, 4.21]; IRD, 24.1 [95% CI: -11.2, 59.3]), pre-frail (85.3 vs 40.4; HR, 1.74 [95% CI: 1.28, 2.37]; IRD, 27.1 [95% CI: 7.6, 46.7]), and frail (218.1 vs 96.4; HR, 2.05 [95% CI: 1.36, 3.10]; IRD, 108.4 [95% CI: 65.0, 151.9]). Although HRs did not vary widely by frailty, the excess number of deaths, as reflected by IRDs, increased with greater frailty level.

Conclusions: Considering both multimorbidity patterns and frailty is important for identifying older adults at greater risk of mortality. Of the five patterns identified, the neuropsychiatric class was associated with lower survival across all frailty levels.

Keywords: Frailty; Heterogeneity; Latent class analysis; Multimorbidity; Risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Unadjusted death rates according to multimorbidity patterns and frailty showing progressively greater mortality rates with increasing frailty state. The neuropsychiatric patterns showed consistently greater mortality rates within each frailty level, and comparable to that of the other multimorbidity patterns with an adjacent higher frailty level. CVD = cardiovascular disease.

References

    1. Bandeen-Roche K, Seplaki CL, Huang J, et al. . Frailty in older adults: a nationally representative profile in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70:1427–1434. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv133 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwée D, et al. ; Gerontopole Brussels Study Group. Frailty and the prediction of negative health outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:1163.e1–1163.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010 - PubMed
    1. Wu C, Smit E, Xue QL, Odden MC. Prevalence and correlates of frailty among community-dwelling Chinese older adults: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;73:102–108. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx098 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamaker ME, Jonker JM, de Rooij SE, Vos AG, Smorenburg CH, van Munster BC. Frailty screening methods for predicting outcome of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:e437–e444. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70259-0 - PubMed
    1. Handforth C, Clegg A, Young C, et al. . The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1091–1101. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu540 - PubMed

Publication types