Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 31;15(1):83.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0716-y.

Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model

Katherine Cullerton  1 , Timothy Donnet  2 , Amanda Lee  3 , Danielle Gallegos  4
Affiliations

Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model

Katherine Cullerton et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Influencing public policy change can be difficult and complex, particularly for those with limited power and resources. For any one issue there may be several groups, including the commercial sector and public health advocates advocating from different policy perspectives. However, much of the public health advocacy literature and tools available for those wanting to improve their practice is based on research from one specific perspective of an issue. This approach deprives advocates of potential insight into the most effective levers for this complex and difficult process. To provide a more comprehensive insight into effective levers for influencing public health policy change, a conceptual model for poorly-resourced advocates was developed. The model was developed through the integration and synthesis of policy process and network theories with the results from three studies conducted previously by the authors: a systematic literature review; a social network analysis of influential actors in Australian nutrition policy; plus in-depth interviews with a sample of these actors who had diverse perspectives on influencing nutrition policy. Through understanding the key steps in this model advocates will be better equipped to increase political and public will, and affect positive policy change.

Keywords: Advocacy; Nutrition; Policy; Policy making; Political will; Public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

QUT University Human Research Ethics Committee provided ethical approval (Approval Number 1400000857). Informed written consent to participate was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Informed written consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A conceptual model for influencing government nutrition policy
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Clavier C, De Leeuw E. Health promotion and the policy process. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2013.
    1. Bridgman P, Davis G. The Australian policy handbook. Australia: Allen & Unwin; 2004.
    1. Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change. 2016;19((14)):2643–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onyx J, Armitage L, Dalton B, Melville R, Casey J, Banks R. Advocacy with gloves on: the “manners” of strategy used by some third sector organizations undertaking advocacy in NSW and Queensland. Volunt Int J Volunt Nonprofit Org. 2010;21(1):41–61. doi: 10.1007/s11266-009-9106-z. - DOI
    1. Christoffel KK. Public health advocacy: process and product. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(5):722–726. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.5.722. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources