Stereotactic Shifts During Frame-Based Image-Guided Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Clinical Measurements

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the magnitude and reason for discrepancies between frame- and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-determined stereotactic coordinates, we reviewed frame-based Gamma Knife radiosurgery procedures in which CBCT was performed before treatment.

Methods and materials: Clinical and treatment documentation was reviewed for 150 frame placements for which stereotactic coordinates were defined via both frame and fiducials on computed tomography imaging and CBCT. Treatment planning system-reported rotational and translational differences and standard deviations (SDs) between frame-based and CBCT-based stereotactic coordinates were recorded. Potential clinical predictors for increased differences were collected. Multiple linear regressions were performed to evaluate for associations with increased translations and rotations.

Results: The absolute mean of the measured pitch, yaw, and roll shifts was 0.14 degrees (range -0.71-0.63 degrees, SD 0.19 degrees), 0.16 degrees (range -0.50 to 0.83 degrees, SD 0.21 degrees), and 0.12 degrees (range 0.37-0.51 degrees, SD 0.15 degrees), respectively. The absolute mean of the measured shifts in the left-right, anteroposterior, and superior-inferior direction was 0.29 mm (range -1.29 to 0.82 mm, SD 0.35 mm), 0.24 mm (range -0.59 to 0.33 mm, SD 0.19 mm), and 0.24 mm (range -0.69 to 0.91 mm, SD 0.27 mm), respectively. Three cases (2.0%) exceeded 1 mm in translational difference, all in the left-right direction (1.05, 1.13, and 1.29 mm). Lower Karnofsky Performance Scale status was associated with greater translational differences (vector magnitude, P = .023) and rotation (pitch, P = .044; yaw, P = .002). Usage of longer total pin length (sum of all 4 fixation pin lengths) was associated with increased rotation but not with translation (P < .001 and P = .56, respectively).

Conclusions: CBCT imaging in this cohort of frame-based cases suggests that the discrepancy in stereotactic coordinates is less than 1 mm or degree in most cases. Low Karnofsky Performance Scale status and longer total pin length correlate with larger differences between frame-defined and CBCT-defined stereotactic coordinates.