Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul;43(7):1573-1582.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials

Affiliations
Review

Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials

Filippo Migliorini et al. Int Orthop. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Background: There exist a relevant number of clinical trials comparing the minimally invasive surgery to the standard-invasive approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Up to date, there are still debates concerning the most effective approach in THA.

Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes concerning patients undergoing primary THA performed via the minimally invasive versus standard-invasive surgery incision.

Material and methods: The search was performed in the main databases, evaluating both quantitative and qualitative results. All the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled trials (nRCTs) comparing the minimally invasive versus the standard-invasive approach were enrolled in this study. We focused on the clinical and radiological outcomes and on the complication rate. Study methodological quality was assessed performing the PEDro critical appraisal scale. All meta-analyses were performed using the Review Manager software. To analyse the publication's bias, we performed the Funnel plot.

Result: We enrolled in our study 4761 patients, undergoing to 4842 total hip arthroplasties. The mean follow-up was 22.26 months. In favour of the minimally invasive group, we reported less total estimated blood loss, shorter surgical duration, and a shorter length of stay. In favour of the standard-invasive group, we reported a higher value of the Harris hip score. Concerning the radiological outcomes, we did not report substantial differences across the two exposures. No difference was observed regarding the risk of femoral fractures, dislocation, and revision rates. We evidenced an increasing risk occurred in an iatrogenic nerve palsy during the minimally invasive approach.

Conclusion: Based on currently available evidences concerning the outcomes following THA and the analysis of our results, we stated no remarkable benefits of the minimally invasive compared to the standard-invasive surgery.

Keywords: Approach; Exposure; Hip prosthesis; Invasive; Mini; Minimally; Standard; Total hip arthroplasty; Total hip replacement; osteoarthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):228-37 - PubMed
    1. Int Orthop. 2015 Aug;39(8):1475-81 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Aug;19(5):538-45 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010 Jul 27;5:46 - PubMed
    1. Int Orthop. 2006 Jun;30(3):167-71 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources