Lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy : Prognostic predictors of long-term postoperative outcome
- PMID: 30171289
- DOI: 10.1007/s00132-018-3624-6
Lumbar disc herniation treated by microendoscopic discectomy : Prognostic predictors of long-term postoperative outcome
Abstract
Purpose: Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is becoming an established and effective minimally invasive surgical method for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH); however, the absence of prognostic factors for long-term outcomes after MED results in a lack of specific criteria for appropriate patient selection. Therefore, we evaluated the long-term outcomes and associated predictors in patients who underwent MED for LDH.
Material and methods: Baseline and follow-up data for 664 LDH patients who suffered from sciatica and underwent primary MED were reviewed retrospectively. Variables at baseline that were analyzed as potential prognostic factors included sociodemographic characteristics, clinical findings, and imaging features. Follow-up data including improvements in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), postoperative low back pain (LBP), reoperation, and excellent/good results according to the modified MacNab criteria were set as outcome variables for univariate and further multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Results: The mean follow-up period was 63.8 ± 20.0 months (range 24-96 months). On average, sufficient improvements in both the VAS score (72.8%) and ODI (63.4%) were observed. In addition, a low postoperative LBP rate (23.9%), low reoperation rate (7.1%), and high rate of excellent/good clinical outcomes (89.9%) were achieved. A multivariate analysis indicated that older age, shorter disease duration, higher preoperative VAS score, lower preoperative ODI, shorter surgical time, lower severity of disc and adjacent disc degeneration, and lower severity of lumbar multifidus atrophy contributed to superior clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: Excellent long-term outcomes after primary MED were achieved and specific sociodemographic, clinical, and imaging variables were identified as prognostic factors that can be used to guide patient selection and clinical decision making.
Keywords: Low back pain; Minimally invasive surgery; Retrospective study; Surgical procedures; Visual analog scale.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30547214
-
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29303471
-
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29303469 Clinical Trial.
-
Full-Endoscopic Technique Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation.Pain Physician. 2015 Jul-Aug;18(4):359-63. Pain Physician. 2015. PMID: 26218939
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 30205219
Cited by
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Documentation of Approach Trauma With Lumbar Endoscopic Interlaminar, Translaminar, Compared to Open Microsurgical Discectomy.Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):343-352. doi: 10.14444/8226. Int J Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35444042 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of symptom duration on the outcomes of lumbar discectomy for radicular pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08912-y. Online ahead of print. Eur Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40488872 Review.
-
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30547214
-
Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Discectomy: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis of 2-Year Follow-up Prospective Data.Neurospine. 2022 Mar;19(1):224-235. doi: 10.14245/ns.2143084.542. Epub 2022 Mar 31. Neurospine. 2022. PMID: 35378590 Free PMC article.
-
Does paraspinal muscle morphometry predict functional status and re-operation after lumbar spinal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2023 Aug;33(8):5269-5281. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09548-6. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36977852 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous