Use of flash glucose-sensing technology (FreeStyle Libre) in youth with type 1 diabetes: AWeSoMe study group real-life observational experience
- PMID: 30171412
- DOI: 10.1007/s00592-018-1218-8
Use of flash glucose-sensing technology (FreeStyle Libre) in youth with type 1 diabetes: AWeSoMe study group real-life observational experience
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Use of flash glucose-sensing technology (FreeStyle Libre) in youth with type 1 diabetes: AWeSoMe study group real-life observational experience.Acta Diabetol. 2018 Dec;55(12):1311. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1227-7. Acta Diabetol. 2018. PMID: 30206698
Abstract
Aims: Frequent glucose testing is required for optimal management of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Limited data are available regarding real-world experience of the novel technology for monitoring by continuous interstitial fluid glucose (IFG), using flash glucose-sensing technology (FSL-CGM). We aimed to assess the effect of FSL-CGM in a real-life clinical setting on glycemic control parameters, compliance, and adverse events among pediatric and young adult T1D patients.
Methods: This observational multi-center study assessed FSL-CGM use (6-12 months) in T1D patients (mean ± SD age 13.4 ± 4.9 years) who purchased the device out-of-pocket. Outcome measures included HbA1c, mean IFG levels, CGM metrics [time in hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dL; < 3 mmol/L), in target range (70-180 mg/dL; 3.9-10 mmol/L), and in hyperglycemia > 240 mg/dL; > 13.3 mmol/L)], frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose, acute complications, skin reactions, and reasons for initiation/discontinuation.
Results: Among patients with regular use of the FSL-CGM (n = 59), mean HbA1c decreased from 8.86 ± 0.23 to 8.05 ± 0.2% (73.3-64.5 mmol/mol) in 3 months (p = 0.0001) and plateaued thereafter. A clinically significant reduction in HbA1c (defined as a decrease of ≥ 0.5%) was associated with shorter diabetes duration. Of 71 patients who initiated use of the FSL-CGM, 12 (16.9%) discontinued during the study period. No statistically significant changes were found after FSL-CGM use, in mean and standard deviation IFG levels, and in time of glucose levels in target, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia ranges. One patient with hypoglycemia unawareness was found dead-in-bed while using FSL-CGM.
Conclusions: Real-life observational data in a self-selected young T1D population demonstrated a significant and sustained reduction in HbA1c with FSL-CGM in one-third of the participants. Surveillance of glucose monitoring should be individualized, especially for patients with hypoglycemia unawareness.
Keywords: Continuous glucose monitoring; Flash glucose monitoring system; FreeStyle libre; Hypoglycemia unawareness; Type 1 diabetes.
Similar articles
-
Effect of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control, Hypoglycemia, Diabetes-Related Distress, and Resource Utilization in the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) Nationwide Audit.Diabetes Care. 2020 Sep;43(9):2153-2160. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0738. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Diabetes Care. 2020. PMID: 32669277 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Glycemic Control and Acute Metabolic Events Among Patients With Insulin-Treated Diabetes.JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2273-2284. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6530. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34077502 Free PMC article.
-
Study of Glycemic Variability in Well-controlled Type 2 Diabetic Patients Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Jan;72(1):18-21. doi: 10.59556/japi.71.0441. J Assoc Physicians India. 2024. PMID: 38736069
-
Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb;(170):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02582.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011. PMID: 21323816 Review.
-
Limitations of 14-Day Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sampling for Assessment of Hypoglycemia and Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Jul;26(7):503-508. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0476. Epub 2024 Feb 16. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38300516 Review.
Cited by
-
Randomised controlled trial of Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop in an Adult Population with Type 1 Diabetes (ADAPT): study protocol and rationale.BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e050635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050635. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35110310 Free PMC article.
-
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes technologies: Glucose monitoring.Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1390-1405. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13451. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022. PMID: 36537528 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Impact of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Glycaemic Control as Measured by HbA1c: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials and Real-World Observational Studies.Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jan;11(1):83-95. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00720-0. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Diabetes Ther. 2020. PMID: 31673972 Free PMC article.
-
Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;14(2):328-337. doi: 10.1177/1932296819870849. Epub 2019 Aug 27. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020. PMID: 31452386 Free PMC article.
-
Type 1 Diabetes Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in the Pediatric Emergency Department Affects Laboratory Test Frequency but Not Treatment Timing.Diabetes Spectr. 2023 Summer;36(3):275-280. doi: 10.2337/ds22-0061. Epub 2023 Mar 15. Diabetes Spectr. 2023. PMID: 37583555 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical