Zero-Profile Versus Cage and Plate in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a Minimum 2 Years of Follow-Up: A Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 30172062
- DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.128
Zero-Profile Versus Cage and Plate in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a Minimum 2 Years of Follow-Up: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: In recent years, increasing numbers of cervical disease cases have been treated with zero-profile devices in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Its short-term efficacy has been widely recognized; however, the evidence for long-term efficacy remains insufficient. The present study assessed the mid-term and long-term efficacy of zero-profile compared with cage and plate structures in ACDF by analyzing the clinical and radiological outcomes after treatment of cervical diseases with a minimum 2 years of follow-up.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive database or platform search in PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using the PRISMA guidelines and identified 10 reports, with 772 patients (375 in the zero-profile group and 397 in the cage and plate group) that met our inclusion criteria. All patients had been followed up for ≥2 years. Two of us used a standardized data collection form to extract relevant data and check its accuracy independently.
Results: The zero-profile group had statistically significant (P < 0.05) less intraoperative blood loss, improved postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle, and decreased incidence of postoperative dysphagia and adjacent segment degeneration compared with the cage and plate group. The operative time, postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index score, and bone fusion rate showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups.
Conclusions: The zero-profile and cage and plate structures achieved comparable mid-term and long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in ACDF. In addition, the zero-profile group showed reduced intraoperative blood loss, improved postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle, and decreased incidence of dysphagia and adjacent segment degeneration complications.
Keywords: ACDF; Adjacent segment degeneration; Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Cage and plate; Dysphagia; Zero-profile.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Zero-profile Device Versus Plate-and-Cage Implant in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study.World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e226-e232. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Apr 12. World Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 29654956
-
A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4391-x. Epub 2016 Feb 23. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26906171
-
[Comparison of effectiveness between zero-profile anchored cage and plate-cage construct in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 15;39(2):193-200. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202410092. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025. PMID: 39971365 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Zero-profile implant versus conventional cage-plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Nov 24;17(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03387-9. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 36434694 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage and Cage with Anterior Plate for Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e117-e131. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.218. Epub 2019 Jan 21. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30677575
Cited by
-
Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer (ROI-C) in the Treatment of Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease.Asian J Neurosurg. 2022 Aug 25;17(2):209-217. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750837. eCollection 2022 Jun. Asian J Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 36120612 Free PMC article.
-
Thorough Comparative Analysis of Stand-Alone Cage and Anterior Cervical Plate for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Asian Spine J. 2022 Oct;16(5):812-830. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0123. Epub 2022 Mar 11. Asian Spine J. 2022. PMID: 35263831 Free PMC article.
-
Adjacent-level biomechanics after single-level anterior cervical interbody fusion with anchored zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate construct: a finite element study.BMC Surg. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00729-4. BMC Surg. 2020. PMID: 32252742 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Efficacy Analysis of the New PRUNUS Spine Plate System for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.Orthop Surg. 2023 May;15(5):1241-1248. doi: 10.1111/os.13672. Epub 2023 Mar 13. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 36915232 Free PMC article.
-
Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 2;18(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03885-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37269002 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous