Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 1:276:87-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.059. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Development and validation of a risk prediction model in patients with adult congenital heart disease

Affiliations

Development and validation of a risk prediction model in patients with adult congenital heart disease

Vivan J M Baggen et al. Int J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Aims: To develop and validate a clinically useful risk prediction tool for patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD).

Methods and results: A risk model was developed in a prospective cohort of 602 patients with moderate/complex ACHD who routinely visited the outpatient clinic of a tertiary care centre in the Netherlands (2011-2013). This model was externally validated in a retrospective cohort of 402 ACHD patients (Czech Republic, 2004-2013). The primary endpoint was the 4-year risk of death, heart failure, or arrhythmia, which occurred in 135 of 602 patients (22%). Model development was performed using multivariable logistic regression. Model performance was assessed with C-statistics and calibration plots. Of the 14 variables that were selected by an expert panel, the final prediction model included age (OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.03, p = 0.031), congenital diagnosis (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.03-2.23, p = 0.034), NYHA class (OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.07-2.84, p = 0.026), cardiac medication (OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.56-3.31, p < 0.001), re-intervention (OR 1.41, 95%CI 0.99-2.01, p = 0.060), BMI (OR 1.03, 95%CI 0.99-1.07, p = 0.123), and NT-proBNP (OR 1.63, 95%CI 1.45-1.84, p < 0.001). Calibration-in-the-large was suboptimal, reflected by a lower observed event rate in the validation cohort (17%) than predicted (36%), likely explained by heterogeneity and different treatment strategies. The externally validated C-statistic was 0.78 (95%CI 0.72-0.83), indicating good discriminative ability.

Conclusion: The proposed ACHD risk score combines six readily available clinical characteristics and NT-proBNP. This tool is easy to use and can aid in distinguishing high- and low-risk patients, which could further streamline counselling, location of care, and treatment in ACHD.

Keywords: Adverse events; Congenital heart disease; Prediction model; Prognosis; Risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources