Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;105(3):745-752.
doi: 10.1093/biomet/asy031. Epub 2018 Jun 24.

Sequential rerandomization

Affiliations

Sequential rerandomization

Quan Zhou et al. Biometrika. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

The seminal work of Morgan & Rubin (2012) considers rerandomization for all the units at one time.In practice, however, experimenters may have to rerandomize units sequentially. For example, a clinician studying a rare disease may be unable to wait to perform an experiment until all the experimental units are recruited. Our work offers a mathematical framework for sequential rerandomization designs, where the experimental units are enrolled in groups. We formulate an adaptive rerandomization procedure for balancing treatment/control assignments over some continuous or binary covariates, using Mahalanobis distance as the imbalance measure. We prove in our key result that given the same number of rerandomizations, in expected value, under certain mild assumptions, sequential rerandomization achieves better covariate balance than rerandomization at one time.

Keywords: Experimental design; Mahalanobis distance; Noncentral chi-squared distribution; Sequential enrolment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Antognini, A. B. & Zagoraiou, M. (2017). Estimation accuracy under covariate-adaptive randomization procedures. Electron. J. Statist. 11, 1180–206.
    1. Athey, S. & Imbens, G. W. (2017). The econometrics of randomized experiments. In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, vol. 1, Duflo E. & Banerjee, A. eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 73–140.
    1. Atkinson, A. C. (1982). Optimum biased coin designs for sequential clinical trials with prognostic factors. Biometrika 69, 61–7.
    1. Berger, V. W. (2010). Minimization, by its nature, precludes allocation concealment, and invites selection bias. Contemp. Clin. Trials 31, 406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Delavande, A., Wagner, Z. & Sood, N. (2016). The impact of repeat HIV testing on risky sexual behavior: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Malawi. J. AIDS Clin. Res. 7, 10.4172/2155-6113.1000549. - DOI - PMC - PubMed