Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;12(1):177-181.
doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0354-8. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios

Marcel T J Kok  1 , Kasper Kok  2 , Garry D Peterson  3 , Rosemary Hill  4 , John Agard  5 , Stephen R Carpenter  6
Affiliations

Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios

Marcel T J Kok et al. Sustain Sci. 2017.

Abstract

What does the future hold for the world's ecosystems and benefits that people obtain from them? While the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has identified the development of scenarios as a key to helping decision makers identify potential impacts of different policy options, it currently lacks a long-term scenario strategy. IPBES will decide how it will approach scenarios at its plenary meeting on 22-28 February 2016, in Kuala Lumpur. IPBES now needs to decide whether it should create new scenarios that better explore ecosystem services and biodiversity dynamics. For IPBES to capture the social-ecological dynamics of biodiversity and ecosystem services, it is essential to engage with the great diversity of local contexts, while also including the global tele-coupling among local places. We present and compare three alternative scenario strategies that IPBES could use and then suggest a bottom-up, cross-scale scenario strategy to improve the policy relevance of future IPBES assessments. We propose five concrete steps as part of an effective, long term scenario development process for IPBES in cooperation with the scientific community.

Keywords: Biodiversity; Cross-scale; Ecosystem services; IPBES; Scenarios.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Strengths and weaknesses of the 3 options
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Absar SM, Preston BL. Extending the shared socioeconomic pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studies. Glob Environ Change. 2015;33:83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.004. - DOI
    1. Carpenter SR, Bennett EM, Peterson GD. Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol Soc. 2006;11:29. doi: 10.5751/ES-01610-110129. - DOI
    1. Cumming GS, Alcamo J, Sala O, Swart R, Bennett EM, Zurek M. Are existing global scenarios consistent with ecological feedbacks? Ecosystems. 2005;8:143–152. doi: 10.1007/s10021-004-0075-1. - DOI
    1. Feldman S, Biggs S. The politics of international assessments: the IAASTD process, reception and significance. J Agrar Change. 2012;12:144–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00333.x. - DOI
    1. Hall R, Sikking Y, Shresth S, Barverman-Scult M, Wojcik A (2015) Report of the community conservation resilience initiative. Global forest coalition, Asunción, Paraguay. Online: http://globalforestcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/CCRI-Report-.... Accessed 02 Feb 2016

LinkOut - more resources