Exploring role clarity in interorganizational spread and scale-up initiatives: the 'INSPIRED' COPD collaborative
- PMID: 30176870
- PMCID: PMC6122743
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3474-2
Exploring role clarity in interorganizational spread and scale-up initiatives: the 'INSPIRED' COPD collaborative
Abstract
Background: Role clarification is consistently documented as a challenging process for inter professional healthcare teams, despite being a core tenet of interprofessional collaboration. This paper explores the role clarification process in two previously unexplored contexts: i) in the dissemination phase of a quality improvement (QI) program, and ii) as part of interorganizational partnerships for the care of chronic disease patients.
Methods: A secondary analysis using asynchronous purposive coding was conducted on an innovative pan-Canadian Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease QI program.
Results: Our study reveals that the iterative structure of QI initiatives in the spread phase can offer numerous unique benefits to role clarification, with the potential challenge of time commitment. In addition, the role clarification process within interorganizational partnerships proved to be relatively well-structured, characterized by three phases: relationship conceptualization or early contact, familiarization, and finally, role division. Common strategies in the last stage included the establishment of working groups and new information-sharing networks.
Conclusion: This article characterizes some ways in which providers and organizational partners negotiate their roles in a changing professional environment. As the movement towards integrated care continues, issues of role clarity are assuming increasing importance in healthcare contexts, and understanding role dynamics can provide valuable insight into the optimization of QI initiatives.
Keywords: Chronic disease care; Interorganizational partnership; Interprofessional collaboration; Organizational factors; Professional roles; Scalability.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
As a QI initiative, formal research ethics board (REB) approval was neither required nor sought by Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; however, some teams sought local REB approval.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
References
-
- Suter E, Arndt J, Arthur N, Parboosingh J, Taylor E, Deutschlander S. Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. J Interprof Care. 2009;2009 10.1080/13561820802338579. - PubMed
-
- Jones ML. Role development and effective practice in specialist and advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03279.x. - PubMed
-
- Orchard, C., Bainbridge, L., Bassendowski, S., Casimiro, L., Stevenson K., Wagner, S. J., Weinberg, L., Curran, V., Di Loreto, L., & Sawatzky-Girling, B. A National Interprofessional Competency Framework 2010. http://www.cihc.ca/files/CIHC_IPCompetencies_Feb1210r.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
-
- Duner A. Care planning and decision-making in teams in Swedish elderly care: a study of interprofessional collaboration and professional boundaries. J Interprof Care. 2013; 10.3109/13561820.2012.757730. - PubMed
-
- Anderson ES, Pollard L, Conroy S, Clague-Baker N. Forming a new clinical team for frail older people: can a group development model help? J Interprof Care. 2014; 10.3109/13561820.2013.853653. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials