The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approach
- PMID: 30177385
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.07.019
The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approach
Abstract
Introduction: Few studies have evaluated the learning curve (LC) for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. It was attempted to assess the LC of this procedure using a multi-outcome approach, accounting for patient complexity.
Material and methods: Data on the first series of children undergoing RALP between November 2007 and December 2017 at the study institution were prospectively collected. Patient complexity factors and peri-operative data including operative time (OT) were retrospectively analyzed. The LC was analyzed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology for OT and a composite parameter (combination of 3 parameters: OT adjusted for patient complexity factors (AOT), complications, and surgical success).
Results: Two surgeons without any experience in robotic surgery performed 42 consecutive RALP in 41 patients. Median age at surgery was 5 years (6 months-15 years), and mean OT was 200 ± 72.8 min. Cumulative sum chart demonstrated biphasic LC for OT and multiphasic LC for composite factor. Based on the CUSUM analysis for composite outcome, the LC for RALP could be divided into three different phases: phase 1, the learning period (1-12 cases); phase 2, the consolidation period (13-22 cases); and phase 3, representing the period of increased competence (23-39 cases). Interphase comparison showed a significant reduction in OT, length of stay, and postoperative pain (P = 0.0001; P = 0.0076; P = 0.039, respectively) CONCLUSION: Numerous distinctly shaped LCs depending on the outcome measures and well-defined learning phase transition points were demonstrated. Patient complexity factors were accounted for, which can influence surgical outcomes. Because there is no perfect indicator of proficiency, a multi-outcome approach was adopted to provide a comprehensive view of the learning process for RALP. More than 41 cases are needed to achieve mastery.
Keywords: CUSUM analysis; Learning curve; Pediatric surgery; Robot-assisted pyeloplasty.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the trainee impact on robotic surgery learning curves: a CUSUM analysis of large series pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02281-w. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40106060
-
Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):478-483. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0822. Epub 2021 Mar 2. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021. PMID: 33651635
-
Learning curve evaluation using cumulative summation analysis-a clinical example of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Aug;50(8):1368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.12.025. Epub 2015 Jan 8. J Pediatr Surg. 2015. PMID: 25783405 Clinical Trial.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z. Epub 2019 Sep 10. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31506749 Review.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants.Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Sep;33(9):925-935. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4082-7. Epub 2017 Apr 1. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017. PMID: 28365863 Review.
Cited by
-
The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 28;18(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01856-3. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38413450
-
A Comparative Analysis of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Pediatric and Adult Patients: Does Age Matter?J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 25;11(19):5651. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195651. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36233520 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):353-365. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9. Epub 2018 Sep 28. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30267283
-
Evaluating the trainee impact on robotic surgery learning curves: a CUSUM analysis of large series pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02281-w. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40106060
-
Narrative review in learning curve and pediatric robotic training program.Transl Pediatr. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):343-349. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-456. Epub 2024 Feb 26. Transl Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38455750 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources