Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance
- PMID: 30179620
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.047
Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance
Abstract
Purpose: The OncotypeDx® GPS (Genomic Prostate Score®) is a 17-gene RNA expression assay intended to help guide treatment decisions in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2 was developed to standardize the risk stratification of lesions identified on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging. We sought to determine whether these tests are associated with an increased risk of biopsy upgrading in men on active surveillance.
Materials and methods: We identified all patients on active surveillance at the University of California-San Francisco who had low/intermediate risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen 20 ng/ml or less and clinical stage T1/T2) and Gleason score 6 disease who underwent multiple biopsies and had a GPS available and/or had undergone multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging with an available PI-RADS version 2 score. The primary study outcome was biopsy upgrading, defined as an increase in the Gleason score from 3 + 3 to 3 + 4 or greater, which was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: Of the men 140 had only GPS test findings, 169 had only a PI-RADS version 2 score and 131 had both data. Each 5-unit increase in the GPS was associated with an increased risk of biopsy upgrading (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.19-1.39, p <0.01). PI-RADS scores of 5 vs 1-2 (HR 4.38, 95% CI 2.36-8.16, p <0.01) and 4 vs 1-2 (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.45-4.76, p <0.01) were also associated with an increased risk of a biopsy upgrade. On subanalysis of patients with GPS and PI-RADS version 2 scores the GPS was associated with biopsy upgrading, adding value to the clinical covariates (partial likelihood ratio p = 0.01).
Conclusions: A higher GPS or a PI-RADS version 2 score of 4 or 5 was associated with an increased risk of biopsy upgrading.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2019 Feb;201(2):306-307. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000553007.26960.b9. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30634362 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4. BJU Int. 2017. PMID: 28267899
-
Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1216-1221. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001186. Epub 2020 Jun 10. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32519915
-
PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30142318
-
MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature.World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1263-1279. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2497-y. Epub 2018 Sep 25. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30255394 Review.
-
The Prognostic Association of Prostate MRI PI-RADS™ v2 Assessment Category and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):507-516. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001821. Epub 2021 Apr 27. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33904755
Cited by
-
Determination of Whether Apex or Non-Apex Prostate Cancer Is the Best Candidate for the Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Predict Pathological Grade Group Upgrading and Upstaging after Radical Prostatectomy.J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 19;12(4):1659. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041659. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36836195 Free PMC article.
-
Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 31288992 Free PMC article.
-
Immunogenomic Biomarkers and Validation in Lynch Syndrome.Cells. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):491. doi: 10.3390/cells12030491. Cells. 2023. PMID: 36766832 Free PMC article.
-
Determining Clinically Based Factors Associated With Reclassification in the Pre-MRI Era using a Large Prospective Active Surveillance Cohort.Urology. 2020 Apr;138:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.041. Epub 2019 Dec 30. Urology. 2020. PMID: 31899230 Free PMC article.
-
Toward a Refined PI-RADS: The Feasibility and Limitations of More Informative Metrics in Reviewing MRI Scans.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Sep;62(3):673-690. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29754. Epub 2025 Mar 26. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40143433 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous