An Examination of Multilevel Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Accountable Care Organization Settings: A Mixed-Methods Study
- PMID: 30180112
- DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000837
An Examination of Multilevel Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Accountable Care Organization Settings: A Mixed-Methods Study
Abstract
Objective: To identify patient, provider, and delivery system-level factors associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and validate findings across multiple data sets.
Design: A concurrent mixed-methods design using electronic health records, provider survey, and provider interview.
Setting: Eight primary care accountable care organization clinics in Nebraska.
Measures: Patients' demographic/social characteristics, health utilization behaviors, and perceptions toward CRC screening; provider demographics and practice patterns; and clinics' delivery systems (eg, reminder system).
Analysis: Quantitative (frequencies, logistic regression, and t tests) and qualitative analyses (thematic coding).
Results: At the patient level, being 65 years of age and older (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, P < .001), being non-Hispanic white (OR = 1.93, P < .001), having insurance (OR = 1.90, P = .01), having an annual physical examination (OR = 2.36, P < .001), and having chronic conditions (OR = 1.65 for 1-2 conditions, P < .001) were associated positively with screening, compared with their counterparts. The top 5 patient-level barriers included discomfort/pain of the procedure (60.3%), finance/cost (57.4%), other priority health issues (39.7%), lack of awareness (36.8%), and health literacy (26.5%). At the provider level, being female (OR = 1.88, P < .001), having medical doctor credentials (OR = 3.05, P < .001), and having a daily patient load less than 15 (OR = 1.50, P = .01) were positively related to CRC screening. None of the delivery system factors were significant except the reminder system. Interview data provided in-depth information on how these factors help or hinder CRC screening. Discrepancies in findings were observed in chronic condition, colonoscopy performed by primary doctors, and the clinic-level system factors.
Conclusions: This study informs practitioners and policy makers on the effective multilevel strategies to promote CRC screening in primary care accountable care organization or equivalent settings. Some inconsistent findings between data sources require additional prospective cohort studies to validate those identified factors in question. The strategies may include (1) developing programs targeting relatively younger age groups or racial/ethnic minorities, (2) adapting multilevel/multicomponent interventions to address low demands and access of local population, (3) promoting annual physical examination as a cost-effective strategy, and (4) supporting organizational capacity and infrastructure (eg, IT system) to facilitate implementation of evidence-based interventions.
Similar articles
-
Barriers and Facilitators of Colorectal Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multilevel Analysis.J Rural Health. 2018 Mar;34(2):202-212. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12248. Epub 2017 Jul 7. J Rural Health. 2018. PMID: 28686787
-
Promoting colorectal cancer screening through a new model of delivering rural primary care in the USA: a qualitative study.Rural Remote Health. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):4187. doi: 10.22605/rrh4187. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Rural Remote Health. 2017. PMID: 28355878
-
Examining Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening of Rural Nebraskans Using Data from Clinics Participating in an Accountable Care Organization: A Study Protocol.F1000Res. 2015 Jul 22;4:298. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6782.1. eCollection 2015. F1000Res. 2015. PMID: 26339476 Free PMC article.
-
Framework and Strategies to Eliminate Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes.Annu Rev Med. 2021 Jan 27;72:383-398. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051619-035840. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Annu Rev Med. 2021. PMID: 33208026 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contributing Factors to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese People: A Review of Quantitative Studies.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 May 17;13(5):506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13050506. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27196920 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The access to colorectal cancer screening in Thai average-risk population: a situational study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1164. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13435-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40890762 No abstract available.
-
A multilevel, low literacy dual language intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening in community clinics in Florida: A randomized controlled trial.Prev Med. 2022 May;158:107021. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107021. Epub 2022 Mar 17. Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 35305995 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Effect of a Tailored Educational Flyer on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Residents: Lessons Learned from a Pilot Randomized Trial.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 29;16(21):3645. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213645. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39518083 Free PMC article.
-
Using cognitive interviews to improve a measure of organizational readiness for implementation.BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09005-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 36707829 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a co-production strategy to facilitate the adoption and implementation of evidence-based colorectal cancer screening interventions for rural health systems: a pilot study.Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Dec 13;3(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00375-2. Implement Sci Commun. 2022. PMID: 36514119 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical