Evaluation of in-office tooth whitening treatment with violet LED: protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 30181185
- PMCID: PMC6129043
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021414
Evaluation of in-office tooth whitening treatment with violet LED: protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Introduction: In-office tooth whitening treatment using violet light emited diode (LED) (405 nm) is a novel bleaching method that causes less sensitivity while offering the same effectiveness as the gold standard (35% hydrogen peroxide, H2O2). This study describes a protocol for the first randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the effects of the two methods.
Methods and analysis: Eighty patients will be divided into four groups: G1 violet LED; G2 violet LED +35% carbamide peroxide; G3 35% H2O2 and G4 violet LED +gingivoplasty. Colour will be measured at baseline, immediately after the first session and at the 15 and 180 days follow-up using the Vita Classical and the digital Easyshade V spectrophotometer (Vita, Zahnfabrik, Germany). Sensitivity after whitening will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale at baseline and at each session in all groups and in all follow-ups. The tissue removed during gingivoplasty (G4) will be submitted to immunohistochemical analysis for the determination of inflammatory changes caused by violet LED. The Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ) will be evaluated before, as well as at established time point controls. The results will be expressed as mean and SD values. After determining the normality of the data, a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance will be used for the comparison of data with normal distribution and the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for data with non-normal distribution. A p<0.05 will be considered indicative of statistical significance. After determining the normality of the data, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used for non-parametric data. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and the Wilcoxon test will be used for comparing data from the PIDAQ.
Ethics and dissemination: This protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of UniversidadeNove de Julho (certificate: 2.034.518). The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Trial registration number: NCT03192852; Pre-results.
Keywords: clinical trial; dental aesthetics; sensitivity; tooth bleaching; violet led.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical evaluation of in-office tooth whitening with violet LED (405 nm): A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021 Sep;35:102385. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102385. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021. PMID: 34116249 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical analysis of color change and tooth sensitivity to violet LED during bleaching treatment: A case series with split-mouth design.Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Sep;27:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 20. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019. PMID: 31121330
-
Effectiveness of and Dental Sensitivity to At-home Bleaching With 4% and 10% Hydrogen Peroxide: A Randomized, Triple-blind Clinical Trial.Oper Dent. 2018 May/Jun;43(3):232-240. doi: 10.2341/16-260-C. Oper Dent. 2018. PMID: 29676979 Clinical Trial.
-
Using violet light during in-office tooth bleaching to enhance the efficacy of carbamide peroxide without increasing bleaching sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lasers Med Sci. 2025 May 10;40(1):218. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04476-x. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40346438 Review.
-
Over-the-counter products in tooth bleaching: A scoping review.J Dent. 2024 Jun;145:104989. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104989. Epub 2024 Apr 4. J Dent. 2024. PMID: 38582435
Cited by
-
Colorimetric evaluation after in-office tooth bleaching with violet LED: 6- and 12-month follow-ups of a randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):837-847. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04062-9. Epub 2021 Jul 16. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34269885 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of violet LED with or without a bleaching gel: a 12-month randomized clinical trial.Front Dent Med. 2024 Oct 15;5:1427301. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1427301. eCollection 2024. Front Dent Med. 2024. PMID: 39917687 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of light activation on tooth whitening using three different light sources.Bioinformation. 2024 Oct 31;20(10):1334-1339. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001334. eCollection 2024. Bioinformation. 2024. PMID: 40092878 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of dental enamel microproperties after bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide and different light sources: An in vitro study.J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):e969-e974. doi: 10.4317/jced.58440. eCollection 2021 Oct. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021. PMID: 34667490 Free PMC article.
-
Bleaching efficacy and tooth sensitivity using violet LED - single-blind randomized controlled trial.Lasers Med Sci. 2025 May 19;40(1):228. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04486-9. Lasers Med Sci. 2025. PMID: 40383865 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Kossatz S, et al. . At-home vs In-office bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent 2016. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical