Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr;21(4):987-993.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0267-2. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

Development of Clinical Domain Working Groups for the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen): lessons learned and plans for the future

Affiliations

Development of Clinical Domain Working Groups for the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen): lessons learned and plans for the future

Laura V Milko et al. Genet Med. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to develop expertly curated and freely accessible resources defining the clinical relevance of genes and variants for use in precision medicine and research. To facilitate expert input, ClinGen has formed Clinical Domain Working Groups (CDWGs) to leverage the collective knowledge of clinicians, laboratory diagnosticians, and researchers. In the initial phase of ClinGen, CDWGs were launched in the cardiovascular, hereditary cancer, and inborn errors of metabolism clinical fields. These early CDWGs established the infrastructure necessary to implement standardized processes developed or adopted by ClinGen working groups for the interpretation of gene-disease associations and variant pathogenicity, and provided a sustainable model for the formation of future disease-focused curation groups. The establishment of CDWGs requires recruitment of international experts to broadly represent the interests of their field and ensure that assertions made are reliable and widely accepted. Building on the successes, challenges, and trade-offs made in establishing the original CDWGs, ClinGen has developed standard operating procedures for the development of CDWGs in new clinical domains, while maximizing efforts to scale up curation and facilitate involvement of external groups who wish to utilize ClinGen methods and infrastructure for expert curation.

Keywords: ClinGen; expert curation; genomic medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Robert D. Steiner is employed by PreventionGenetics, a commercial laboratory offering DNA diagnostic testing. He is also a consultant to and holds stock options in Acer Therapeutics and Censa Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
- A typical CDWG has leadership of one or more co-chairs (red), a ClinGen PI liaison and coordinator (lt. blue) along with a core representation of international experts in the field (yellow). The Executive Committee members contribute to and recruit additional members for Gene Curation and Variant Curation Expert curation Panels (blue and purple). ClinGen provides coordination (lt. blue) and curation (teal) support.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
- Cumulative numbers of clinical validity gene curations for Years 1–5, corresponding with the project periods for Years 2–4 of ClinGen, Phase 1 (08/01/2014 through 07/31/17) through the date of submission in the current year of ClinGen, Phase 2 (8/01/17 – 03/27/18). Five of the Gene Curation Expert Panels (Breast/Ovarian Cancer, Brugada Syndrome, Colon Cancer, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection) have completed their gene lists, and have published or are preparing manuscripts. As of 04/2018, ClinGen has completed 512 gene-disease clinical validity curations, including curations that were performed outside the scope of the CDWGs.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
– Map of ClinGen working group membership. Countries with CDWG members are shown in blue.

References

    1. Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD, et al. ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource. N. Engl. J. Med 2015;372(23):2235–2242. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1406261. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strande NT, Riggs ER, Buchanan AH, et al. Evaluating the Clinical Validity of Gene-Disease Associations: An Evidence-Based Framework Developed by the Clinical Genome Resource. Am. J. Hum. Genet 2017;100(6):895–906. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.04.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunter JE, Irving SA, Biesecker LG, et al. A standardized, evidence-based protocol to assess clinical actionability of genetic disorders associated with genomic variation. Genet. Med 2016;18(12):1258–1268. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.40. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ritter DI, Roychowdhury S, Roy A, et al. Somatic cancer variant curation and harmonization through consensus minimum variant level data. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):117. doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0367-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel RY, Shah N, Jackson AR, et al. ClinGen Pathogenicity Calculator: a configurable system for assessing pathogenicity of genetic variants. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):3. doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0391-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources