Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;44(4):159-166.
doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.4.159. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures

Akeem O Alawode  1 , Michael O Adeyemi  2 , Olutayo James  2 , Mobolanle O Ogunlewe  2 , Azeez Butali  3 , Wasiu L Adeyemo  2
Affiliations

A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures

Akeem O Alawode et al. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare wound healing complications following the use of either absorbable or non-absorbable sutures for skin closure in cleft lip repair.

Materials and methods: This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi Araba, Lagos State, Nigeria. Sixty subjects who required either primary or secondary cleft lip repair and satisfied all the inclusion criteria were recruited and randomized into two groups (Vicryl group or Nylon group). The surgical wounds in all subjects were examined on 3rd, 7th, and 14th postoperative days (POD) for presence or absence of tissue reactivity, wound dehiscence, and local wound infection.

Results: Hemorrhage, tissue reactivity, wound dehiscence, and local wound infection were identified as wound healing complications following cleft lip repair. The incidence of postoperative wound healing complications on POD3 was 33.3%. Tissue reactivity was more common throughout the evaluation period with the use of an absorbable (Vicryl) suture compared to a non-absorbable (Nylon) suture, although the difference was statistically significant only on POD7 (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in the incidences of wound dehiscence and infection between the two groups throughout the observation period.

Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of wound dehiscence and surgical site wound infection following the use of either Vicryl or Nylon for skin closure during cleft lip repair. However, more cases of tissue reactivity were recorded in the Vicryl group than in the Nylon group on POD7. Particular attention must be paid to detect the occurrence of wound healing complications, most especially tissue reactivity, whenever a Vicryl suture is used for skin closure in cleft lip repair.

Keywords: Absorbable; Non-absorbable; Orofacial cleft; Sutures; Wound healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Costello BJ, Ruiz RL. Cleft lip and palate: comprehensive treatment planning and primary repair. In: Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen P, Waite P, Peterson LJ, editors. Peterson's principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2nd ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2004. pp. 839–858.
    1. Goodacre T, Swan MC. Cleft lip and palate: current management. Paediatr Child Health. 2008;6:283–292.
    1. Olasoji HO, Dogo D, Obiano K, Yawe T. Cleft lip and palate in north eastern Nigeria. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 1997;7:209–213.
    1. Sitversen A, Wilcox A, Johnson GE, Abyholm F, Vindenes HA, Lie RT. Prevalence of major anatomic variations in oral clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:587–595. - PubMed
    1. Eigbobo JO, Akadiri OA. Pattern of cleft lip and palate deformities and associated anomalies in a selected Nigerian population. Niger J Plast Surg. 2011;7:59–64.