Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 20;36(30):3023-3030.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.0957. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

End-of-Life Care Intensity in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Population-Level Analysis

Affiliations

End-of-Life Care Intensity in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Population-Level Analysis

Emily E Johnston et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Intensity of end-of-life care receives much attention in oncology because of concerns that high-intensity care is inconsistent with patient goals, leads to worse caregiver outcomes, and is expensive. Little is known about such care in those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), a population at high risk for morbidity and mortality.

Patients and methods: We conducted a population-based analysis of patients who died between 2000 and 2013, within 1 year of undergoing an inpatient allogeneic HCT using California administrative data. Previously validated markers of intensity were examined and included: hospital death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and procedures such as intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation at end of life. Multivariable logistic regression models determined clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with: hospital death, a medically intense intervention (ICU admission, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, hemodialysis, intubation), and ≥ two intensity markers.

Results: Of the 2,135 patients in the study population, 377 were pediatric patients (age ≤ 21 years), 461 were young adults (age 22 to 39 years), and 1,297 were adults (age ≥ 40 years). The most common intensity markers were: hospital death (83%), ICU admission (49%), and intubation (45%). Medical intensity varied according to age, underlying diagnosis, and presence of comorbidities at time of HCT. Patients with higher-intensity end-of-life care included patients age 15 to 21 years and 30 to 59 years, patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and those with comorbidities at time of HCT.

Conclusion: Patients dying within 1 year of inpatient allogeneic HCT are receiving medically intense end-of-life care with variations related to age, underlying diagnosis, and presence of comorbidities at time of HCT. Future studies need to determine if these patterns are consistent with patient and family goals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram showing the study population. The study population included all patients who died between 2000 and 2013 in California and underwent an inpatient hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) within 1 year of death who did not die as a result of peripartum events or trauma (N = 2,135).
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Rates of intense end-of-life care by age category (overall, pediatric [age 0 to 21 years], adolescent and young adult [AYA; age 22 to 39 years], and adult [age ≥ 40 years]).
Fig A1.
Fig A1.
Rates of intense end-of-life care by timing of death (during hematopoietic cell transplantation [HCT] admission or not) for the three primary outcomes: hospital death, receipt of a medically intense intervention, and presence of ≥ two intensity markers. The rates are broken down by age category (overall, pediatric, adolescent and young adult [AYA], and adult).

References

    1. Center for International Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant Research : HCT trends and survival data, 2017 update. https://www.cibmtr.org/ReferenceCenter/SlidesReports/SummarySlides/pages...
    1. Weeks JC, Cook EF, O’Day SJ, et al. : Relationship between cancer patients’ predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences. JAMA 279:1709-1714, 1998 - PubMed
    1. McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Zhong Z, et al. : Dying with cancer: Patients’ function, symptoms, and care preferences as death approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:S110-S121, 2000. (suppl) - PubMed
    1. Wright AA, Keating NL, Ayanian JZ, et al. : Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life. JAMA 315:284-292, 2016 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, et al. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA. 2008;300:1665–1673. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types