Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;42(6):1485-1491.
doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1211-1. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

The Histological Composition of Capsular Contracture Focussed on the Inner Layer of the Capsule: An Intra-Donor Baker-I Versus Baker-IV Comparison

Affiliations

The Histological Composition of Capsular Contracture Focussed on the Inner Layer of the Capsule: An Intra-Donor Baker-I Versus Baker-IV Comparison

E de Bakker et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Capsular contracture remains one of the major complications after breast implantation surgery. The extent of capsular contraction is scored using the Baker scale. The aim of this study was to compare intra-individual Baker-I with Baker-IV capsules, and in particular the prevalence and histological properties of the inner capsule layer.

Methods: Twenty capsules from ten patients were included after bilateral explantation surgery due to unilateral capsular contracture (Baker-IV) after cosmetic augmentation with textured implants. All capsules underwent (immune-)histochemical analysis: haematoxylin-eosin (morphology), CD68 (macrophages), cytokeratin (epithelial cells) and vimentin (fibroblasts), and were visually scored for cell density and the presence of an inner layer and measured for thickness.

Results: Baker-IV (n = 10) capsules were significantly thicker compared to Baker-I (n = 10) capsules (P = 0.004). An inner layer was present in 8 Baker-I capsules. All Baker-I capsules were vimentin and CD68-positive and cytokeratin-negative. Positive vimentin was seen throughout the inner layer, and CD-68 staining was observed adjacent to the intermediate capsule layer. In contrast, only 2 Baker-IV capsules had an inner layer, of which only 1 showed the same profile as Baker-I capsules (P = 0.016). No cytokeratin positivity was seen in any capsule. In Baker-IV capsules, outer layers showed more positivity for both vimentin and CD68.

Conclusion: The inner layer is morphologically consistent with synovial metaplasia and is more prevalent in healthy, uncontracted Baker-I capsules. This inverse relation between the presence of the inner layer and higher Baker classification or pathological contracture could indicate a protective role of the inner layer against capsular contracture formation.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Keywords: Breast augmentation; Breast reconstruction; Capsular contracture; Histology; Immunohistology; Synovial metaplasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intra-donor differences in Baker-I and Baker-IV capsular thickness. Average of 5 different measurements within a tissue section is shown for each capsule. Each line represents one donor with a Baker-I and a Baker-IV capsule. Thickness is shown in micrometre (µm)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Capsule thickness measurement and layers. Representative photograph of Baker-IV capsule is shown with a inner layer, b intermediate layer—note extracellular matrix is aligned in line with the implant and c outer layer—note extracellular matrix is aligned perpendicular with the implant. The 5 thickness measurements used in Fig. 1 are indicated with green bars
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(Immuno-)histochemical staining results of a representative Baker-I and Baker-IV capsule from the same donor. Shown are × 10 and × 40 magnifications

References

    1. Araco A, Caruso R, Araco F, et al. Capsular contractures: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1808–1819. - PubMed
    1. Collis N, Coleman D, Foo IT, et al. Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(4):786–791. - PubMed
    1. Fernandes JR, Salinas HM, Broelsch GF, et al. Prevention of capsular contracture with photochemical tissue passivation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):571–577. - PubMed
    1. Forsberg CG, Kelly DA, Wood BC, et al. Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;72:0–4. - PubMed
    1. Giordano S, Peltoniemi H, Lilius P, et al. Povidone-iodine combined with antibiotic topical irrigation to reduce capsular contracture in cosmetic breast augmentation: a comparative study. Aesthetic Surg J. 2013;33(5):675–680. - PubMed