Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 13;52(6):1801219.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.01219-2018. Print 2018 Dec.

Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: friend or foe?

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: friend or foe?

Alvar Agusti et al. Eur Respir J. .
Free article

Abstract

The efficacy, safety and positioning of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is much debated, since it can result in clear clinical benefits in some patients ("friend") but can be ineffective or even associated with undesired side effects, e.g. pneumonia, in others ("foe"). After critically reviewing the evidence for and against ICS treatment in patients with COPD, we propose that: 1) ICS should not be used as a single, stand-alone therapy in COPD; 2) patients most likely to benefit from the addition of ICS to long-acting bronchodilators include those with history of multiple or severe exacerbations despite appropriate maintenance bronchodilator use, particularly if blood eosinophils are >300 cells·µL-1, and those with a history of and/or concomitant asthma; and 3) the risk of pneumonia in COPD patients using ICS is higher in those with older age, lower body mass index (BMI), greater overall fragility, receiving higher ICS doses and those with blood eosinophils <100 cells·µL-1 All these factors must be carefully considered and balanced in any individual COPD patient before adding ICS to her/his maintenance bronchodilator treatment. Further research is needed to clarify some of these issues and firmly establish these recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A. Agusti reports receiving grants from GSK; lectures fees from Novartis and Chiesi; grants, and lecture and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca; and lecture and advisory board fees from Boheringer Ingelheim, all outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L.M. Fabbri reports being paid for lectures and membership of advisory boards, and receiving travel expense reimbursement and grants for research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Merck Sharp & Dhome, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Menarini, Laboratori Guidotti and Almirall; being paid for lectures and membership of advisory boards, and receiving travel expense reimbursement from Pearl Therapeutics, Mundipharma, Boston Scientific and Zambon; being paid for lectures by Kyorin and Bayer; and has received grants for research from Pfizer, Dompe, Malesci, Biofutura Italia and Vree Health Italia. Conflict of interest: D. Singh reports grants and personal fees from Almirall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, NAPP, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Therevance, and Verona; and personal fees from Genentech and Skyepharma, all outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Vestbo reports receiving personal fees for consultancy on COPD phase 2 and 3 programmes, and payment for lectures including service in speaker bureau, from GlaxoSmithKline, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Celli reports personal fees and funding for a research site from AstraZeneca, and consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Chiesi and Menarini, all outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F.M.E. Franssen reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline and Teva; and grants and personal fees from Novartis, all outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K.F. Rabe reports receiving consultancy and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, Intermune, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals and Berlin Chemie; and grants from Ministry of Education and Science, Germany, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Papi reports receiving fees for board membership, consultancy, payment for lectures, grants for research, travel expense reimbursement from Chiesi, Astrazeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, and TEVA; payment for lectures and travel expense reimbursement from Menarini, Novartis and Zambon; and grants for research from Sanofi, all outside the submitted work.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances