Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;62(4):425-448.
doi: 10.1017/mdh.2018.41.

Health Planning in 1960s Africa: International Health Organisations and the Post-Colonial State

Health Planning in 1960s Africa: International Health Organisations and the Post-Colonial State

John Manton et al. Med Hist. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

This article explores the programme of national health planning carried out in the 1960s in West and Central Africa by the World Health Organization (WHO), in collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Health plans were intended as integral aspects of economic development planning in five newly independent countries: Gabon, Liberia, Mali, Niger and Sierra Leone. We begin by showing that this episode is treated only superficially in the existing WHO historiography, then introduce some relevant critical literature on the history of development planning. Next we outline the context for health planning, noting: the opportunities which independence from colonial control offered to international development agencies; the WHO's limited capacity in Africa; and its preliminary efforts to avoid imposing Western values or partisan views of health system organisation. Our analysis of the plans themselves suggests they lacked the necessary administrative and statistical capacity properly to gauge local needs, while the absence of significant financial resources meant that they proposed little more than augmentation of existing structures. By the late 1960s optimism gave way to disappointment as it became apparent that implementation had been minimal. We describe the ensuing conflict within WHO over programme evaluation and ongoing expenditure, which exposed differences of opinion between African and American officials over approaches to international health aid. We conclude with a discussion of how the plans set in train longer processes of development planning, and, perhaps less desirably, gave bureaucratic shape to the post-colonial state.

Keywords: Africa; Development; Health systems; Planning; World Health Organization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Milton Siegel (left); John Karefa-Smart (right), leading officials of the WHO active in the debate on the evaluation of the Africa health plans. (Left: WHO Archives photo ref. WHO_14661 – Caption: Milton P. Siegel, Assistant Director-General of WHO. © World Health Organization/Tibor Farkas. Right: WHO Archives photo ref. WHO_11980 – Caption: Dr John Karefa-Smart, Assistant Director-General of WHO. © World Health Organization/Tibor Farkas.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parassitologia. 2000 Jun;42(1-2):149-66 - PubMed
    1. World Health Forum. 1998;19(4):382-7 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1956;15(6):911-35 - PubMed
    1. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1954 Jun;83:3-46 - PubMed
    1. Health Policy Plan. 1986 Mar;1(1):58-66 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources