Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on 6-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes
- PMID: 30193087
- PMCID: PMC6636355
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546518793881
Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on 6-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Knee laxity in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often assessed through physical examination using the Lachman, pivot shift, and anterior drawer tests. The degree of laxity noted on these examinations may influence treatment decisions and prognosis.
Hypothesis: Increased preoperative knee laxity is associated with increased risk of revision ACL reconstruction, increased risk of contralateral ACL reconstruction, and poorer patient-reported outcomes at 6 years postoperatively.
Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: 2333 patients who underwent primary isolated ACL reconstruction without additional ligament injury were identified. Patients reported by the operating surgeons to have an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade D Lachman, anterior drawer, or pivot shift examination were classified as having a high-grade laxity. Multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate whether having high-grade preoperative laxity was predictive of increased odds of undergoing subsequent revision or contralateral ACL reconstruction within 6 years of the index procedure, controlling for patient age, sex, body mass index, Marx activity level, sport, graft type, medial meniscal treatment, and lateral meniscal treatment. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to evaluate whether having high-grade preoperative laxity was predictive of poorer IKDC or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Knee-Related Quality of Life (KOOS-QOL) scores at 6 years postoperatively, after controlling for baseline score, patient age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, marital status, smoking status, sport participation, competition level, Marx activity rating score, graft type, and articular cartilage and meniscal status.
Results: In total, 743 of 2325 patients (32.0%) were noted to have high-grade laxity on at least 1 physical examination test. High-grade Lachman was noted in 334 patients (14.4%), high-grade pivot shift was noted in 617 patients (26.5%), and high-grade anterior drawer was noted in 233 patients (10.0%). Six-year revision and contralateral ACL reconstruction data were available for 2129 patients (91.6%). High-grade prereconstruction Lachman was associated with significantly increased odds of ACL graft revision (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10-2.80, P = .02) and contralateral ACL reconstruction (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.69; P = .019). High-grade prereconstruction pivot shift was associated with significantly increased odds of ACL graft revision (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.19-2.54, P = .002) but not with significantly increased odds of contralateral ACL reconstruction (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.89-1.87; P = .16). High-grade prereconstruction laxity was associated with statistically significantly lower 6-year IKDC (β = -2.26, P = .003), KOOS-QOL (β = -2.67, P = .015), and Marx activity scores (β = -0.54, P = .020), but these differences did not approach clinically relevant differences in patient-reported outcomes.
Conclusion: High-grade preoperative knee laxity is predictive of increased odds of revision ACL reconstruction and contralateral ACL reconstruction 6 years after ACL reconstruction. Poorer patient-reported outcome scores in the high-grade laxity group were also noted, but the difference did not reach a level of clinical relevance.
Keywords: Lachman test; anterior cruciate ligament; anterior drawer test; knee laxity; pivot shift test.
Similar articles
-
Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3077-3082. doi: 10.1177/0363546516656835. Epub 2016 Aug 1. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27480978 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior and Rotational Knee Laxity Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Knee Function 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;47(9):2077-2085. doi: 10.1177/0363546519857076. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 31307221 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated With High-Grade Lachman, Pivot Shift, and Anterior Drawer at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1080-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.018. Epub 2016 Jan 25. Arthroscopy. 2016. PMID: 26821957 Free PMC article.
-
Good mid-term outcomes and low rates of residual rotatory laxity, complications and failures after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET).Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Feb;28(2):418-431. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05625-w. Epub 2019 Jul 19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020. PMID: 31324964
-
The effect of knee bracing on the knee function and stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Oct;105(6):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31279767
Cited by
-
Association of Ligamentous Laxity, Male Sex, Chronicity, Meniscal Injury, and Posterior Tibial Slope With a High-Grade Preoperative Pivot Shift: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STABILITY Study.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 6;9(4):23259671211000038. doi: 10.1177/23259671211000038. eCollection 2021 Apr. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 33889648 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis With ACL Reconstruction in Children and Adolescents.Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Apr 6;10(4):23259671221088049. doi: 10.1177/23259671221088049. eCollection 2022 Apr. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 35400143 Free PMC article.
-
Pivot shift intraoperative quantitative assessment using a smartphone accelerometer in ACL deficient knees.J Exp Orthop. 2023 Jan 25;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00570-7. J Exp Orthop. 2023. PMID: 36695976 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Augmented With Allograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Dec 13;11(12):23259671231214803. doi: 10.1177/23259671231214803. eCollection 2023 Dec. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 38107845 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors for Contra-Lateral Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2021 Jul;51(7):1419-1438. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01424-3. Epub 2021 Jan 30. Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 33515391 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Donaldson WF 3rd, Warren RF, Wickiewicz T. A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations. Initial versus examination under anesthesia. Am J Sports Med. 1985;13(1):5–10. - PubMed
-
- Eitzen I, Holm I, Risberg MA. Preoperative quadriceps strength is a significant predictor of knee function two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(5):371–376. - PubMed
-
- Galway HR, MacIntosh DL. The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980(147):45–50. - PubMed
-
- Gurer G, Bozbas GT, Tuncer T, Unubol AI, Ucar UG, Memetoglu OI. Frequency of joint hypermobility in Turkish patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross sectional multicenter study. Int J Rheum Dis. 2016. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical