A two-level hierarchical framework of visual short-term memory
- PMID: 30193344
- DOI: 10.1167/18.9.2
A two-level hierarchical framework of visual short-term memory
Abstract
Over the last couple of decades, a vast amount of research has been dedicated to understanding the nature and the architecture of visual short-term memory (VSTM), the mechanism by which currently relevant visual information is maintained. According to discrete-capacity models, VSTM is constrained by a limited number of discrete representations held simultaneously. In contrast, shared-resource models regard VSTM as limited in resources, which can be distributed flexibly between varying numbers of representations; and a new interference model posits that capacity is limited by interference among items. In this article, we begin by reviewing benchmark findings regarding the debate over VSTM limitations, focusing on whether VSTM storage is all-or-none and on whether object complexity affects capacity. After that, we put forward a hybrid framework of VSTM architecture, arguing that this system is composed of a two-level hierarchy of memory stores, each containing a different set of representations: (1) perceptual memory, a resourcelike level containing analog automatically formed representations of visual stimuli in varying degrees of activation, and (2) visual working memory, in which a subset of three to four items from perceptual memory are bound to conceptual representations and to their locations, thus conveying discrete (digital/symbolic) information which appears quantized. While perceptual memory has a large capacity and is relatively nonselective, visual working memory is restricted in the number of items that can be maintained simultaneously, and its content is regulated by a gating mechanism.
Similar articles
-
Is there a K in capacity? Assessing the structure of visual short-term memory.Cogn Psychol. 2020 Sep;121:101305. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101305. Epub 2020 Jun 9. Cogn Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32531272
-
Visual short-term memory load strengthens selective attention.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):549-56. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0503-3. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 24002967
-
Towards an integrative model of visual short-term memory maintenance: Evidence from the effects of attentional control, load, decay, and their interactions in childhood.Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:61-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 19. Cognition. 2017. PMID: 28865285
-
Toward ecologically realistic theories in visual short-term memory research.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Oct;76(7):2158-70. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0649-8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014. PMID: 24658920 Review.
-
Interactions between attention and visual short-term memory (VSTM): what can be learnt from individual and developmental differences?Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1435-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.001. Epub 2010 Dec 23. Neuropsychologia. 2011. PMID: 21185321 Review.
Cited by
-
The voluntary utilization of visual working memory.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 5;14(1):7987. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58685-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38575646 Free PMC article.
-
Contributions from Long-Term Memory Explain Superior Visual Working Memory Performance with Meaningful Objects.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Jul 10:2025.07.07.663569. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.07.663569. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID: 40672283 Free PMC article. Preprint.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources