Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Nov 1;154(11):1265-1271.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3022.

Comparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States

Hao Feng  1 , Juliana Berk-Krauss  1   2 , Paula W Feng  2 , Jennifer A Stein  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Dermatologist Density Between Urban and Rural Counties in the United States

Hao Feng et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Abstract

Importance: As the US population continues to increase and age, there is an unmet need for dermatologic care; therefore, it is important to identify and understand the characteristics and patterns of the dermatologist workforce.

Objective: To analyze the longitudinal dermatologist density and urban-rural disparities using a standardized classification scheme.

Design, setting, and participants: This study analyzed county-level data for 1995 to 2013 from the Area Health Resources File to evaluate the longitudinal trends and demographic and environmental factors associated with the geographic distribution of dermatologists.

Main outcomes and measures: Active US dermatologist and physician density.

Results: In this study of nationwide data on dermatologists, dermatologist density increased by 21% from 3.02 per 100 000 people to 3.65 per 100 000 people from 1995 to 2013; the gap between the density of dermatologists in urban and other areas increased from 2.63 to 3.06 in nonmetropolitan areas and from 3.41 to 4.03 in rural areas. The ratio of dermatologists older than 55 years to younger than 55 years increased 75% in nonmetropolitan and rural areas (from 0.32 to 0.56) and 170% in metropolitan areas (from 0.34 to 0.93). Dermatologists tended to be located in well-resourced, urban communities.

Conclusions and relevance: Our findings suggest that substantial disparities in the geographic distribution of dermatologists exist and have been increasing with time. Correcting the workforce disparity is important for patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Comment in

References

    1. Dall TM, Gallo PD, Chakrabarti R, West T, Semilla AP, Storm MV. An aging population and growing disease burden will require a large and specialized health care workforce by 2025. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(11):2013-2020. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0714 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kosmadaki MG, Gilchrest BA. The demographics of aging in the United States: implications for dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(11):1427-1428. doi: 10.1001/archderm.138.11.1427-a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donaldson MR, Coldiron BM. No end in sight: the skin cancer epidemic continues. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2011;30(1):3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2011.01.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Resneck JS., Jr Dermatology workforce policy then and now: reflections on Dr Peyton Weary’s 1979 manuscript. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(2):338-339. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kimball AB, Resneck JS Jr. The US dermatology workforce: a specialty remains in shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(5):741-745. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.037 - DOI - PubMed