A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
- PMID: 30193589
- PMCID: PMC6129007
- DOI: 10.1186/s12937-018-0390-6
A systematic search and qualitative review of reporting bias of lifestyle interventions in randomized controlled trials of diabetes prevention and management
Abstract
Background: Scholars have documented presumptions regarding the relationships between diet, exercise, weight, and type 2 diabetes. However, it is unclear to what extent researchers contribute to these presumptions, and how often these relationships are thoroughly delineated within the context of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thus, the aim was to conduct a systematic search and qualitative, thematic analysis of RCTs focusing on lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention or management, to examine how researchers discuss body weight in 1) the rationale and design of their RCTs; and 2) their presentation and interpretation of their findings.
Methods: We completed an electronic search for records published between 2007 and November 2016. Selection criteria included: RCTs with a follow-up period of ≥12 months; adult participants with type 2 diabetes/pre-diabetes; lifestyle interventions classified as dietary, exercise, and/or behavioural; primary outcomes of incident diabetes and complications, mortality, cardiovascular disease, and quality of life; and secondary outcomes of glycemic control and blood pressure. Nineteen articles were identified for inclusion and subject to thematic content analysis.
Results: Obesity and weight loss figured prominently in the rationale and outcomes of the majority of the articles, despite intentional exclusion of "weight loss" and "obesity" as search terms. There was ambiguity over whether weight loss was classified as inclusive to the intervention, an outcome, or a measure of adherence. Results revealed that authors frequently engaged in "spin reporting" by pooling data from intervention and control groups to test the relationship between weight lost and outcomes and in their presentation of results.
Conclusions: Researchers need to be aware of their biases and assumptions regarding body weight in designing, analyzing, and interpreting lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention and management.
Keywords: Diabetes; Lifestyle; Participant adherence; Patient-oriented research; Randomized controlled trials; Reporting bias; Spin reporting.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447010
-
Lifestyle changes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 28;3(3):CD007506. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007506.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30921477 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of dietary and physical activity interventions on the risk of type 2 diabetes in South Asians: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials.Diabetologia. 2019 Aug;62(8):1337-1348. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4905-2. Epub 2019 Jun 15. Diabetologia. 2019. PMID: 31201437 Review.
-
Preconception lifestyle advice for people with infertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 29;4(4):CD008189. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008189.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33914901 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a Lifestyle Intervention to Prevent Deterioration in Glycemic Status Among South Asian Women With Recent Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220773. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0773. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35234881 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Exploring attitudes toward taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages in rural Michigan.J Health Popul Nutr. 2021 Aug 3;40(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41043-021-00259-6. J Health Popul Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34344480 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Diabetes Federation . Diabetes Atlas. seventh 2015.
-
- Solomon M. Making medical knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
-
- Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray DA, Delahanty L, Hoskin M, Kriska AM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pi-Sunyer X, Regensteiner J, Venditti B, Wylie-Rosett J. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2102–2107. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0560. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical