Outcomes and Quality of Life Among Men After Anal Sphincter-Sparing Transperineal Rectourethral Fistula Repair
- PMID: 30193844
- PMCID: PMC6289716
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.052
Outcomes and Quality of Life Among Men After Anal Sphincter-Sparing Transperineal Rectourethral Fistula Repair
Abstract
Objective: To describe long-term quality of life (QOL) outcomes after rectourethral fistula (RUF) repair. RUF is a debilitating diagnosis and complex surgical dilemma with limited data regarding QOL after repair.
Methods: Patients at a tertiary referral center undergoing transperineal RUF repair 1/2009-5/2016 were analyzed. Patients were contacted by telephone to assess QOL following repair. Descriptive analysis performed of short-term surgical data (success and complications) and long-term QOL data (novel questionnaire).
Results: Twenty one men underwent RUF surgery with 95% success after initial repair. Fifty two percent had a history of radiation and/or ablation. Four individuals (19%) experienced a Clavien-Dindo complication within 30 days, with 3 of those being grade III+. Fifteen had postoperative urinary incontinence, of whom 73% underwent artificial urinary sphincter placement. Three previously radiated individuals underwent subsequent urethral stricture surgery. At long-term follow-up (mean 45.6 ± 27.1 months), 53% reported perineal pain, 43% reported problems related to the gracilis flap, and 80% reported urinary incontinence (primarily occasional mild leakage). Twenty one percent were unable to do the things they wanted in their daily lives, while 80% reported that surgery positively impacted their life. None would have opted for complete urinary diversion.
Conclusion: RUF repair leads to patient satisfaction and improved QOL, despite possible residual issues such as perineal pain and urinary incontinence. Definitive RUF repair should be offered to suitable radiated and nonradiated patients.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Comment in
-
EDITORIAL COMMENT.Urology. 2018 Nov;121:180-181. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.071. Urology. 2018. PMID: 30526904 No abstract available.
-
Re: Outcomes and Quality of Life among Men after Anal Sphincter-Sparing Transperineal Rectourethral Fistula Repair.J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):23. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000269. Epub 2019 Jun 7. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30932767 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Short- and Long-term Complications and Outcomes of Radiation and Surgically Induced Rectourethral Fistula Repair With Buccal Mucosa Graft and Muscle Interposition Flap.Urology. 2016 Dec;98:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.065. Epub 2016 Aug 15. Urology. 2016. PMID: 27538801
-
Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing transperineal repair with gracilis muscle interposition for complex rectourethral fistula.Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):736-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.009. Urology. 2011. PMID: 21377021
-
Rectourethral Fistula Induced by Localised Prostate Cancer Treatment: Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Transperineal Repair with Gracilis Muscle Flap Interposition.Eur Urol. 2022 Mar;81(3):305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Oct 20. Eur Urol. 2022. PMID: 34686386
-
Complications after radical prostatectomy: anastomotic stricture and rectourethral fistula.Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Nov;21(6):461-4. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834b7e1b. Curr Opin Urol. 2011. PMID: 21934623 Review.
-
One stage fistulectomy for high anal fistula with reconstruction of anal sphincter without fecal diversion.Asian J Surg. 2019 Aug;42(8):792-796. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Feb 6. Asian J Surg. 2019. PMID: 30738718 Review.
Cited by
-
Advance in research of treatment and prognosis of iatrogenic rectourethral fistula.Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jul 28;46(7):753-758. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.200617. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021. PMID: 34382593 Free PMC article. Chinese, English.
-
Adverse Features of Rectourethral Fistula Requiring Extirpative Surgery and Permanent Dual Diversion: Our Experience and Recommendations.J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 5;10(17):4014. doi: 10.3390/jcm10174014. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34501462 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Tissue Flaps in the Management of Urinary Tract Fistulas.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Apr 30;20(6):32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0892-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31041546 Review.
-
[Fistula surgery].Urologe A. 2020 Apr;59(4):489-498. doi: 10.1007/s00120-020-01167-z. Urologe A. 2020. PMID: 32236687 German.
-
Post-traumatic rectourethral fistula in an adolescent managed via a transperineal approach using a local gluteal tissue interposition flap: a case report.Surg Case Rep. 2021 Dec 16;7(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s40792-021-01335-z. Surg Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 34914015 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singla N, Morey AF. Rectourethral fistula reconstruction in elderly patients. Current Opinion in Urology 2016;26:171–6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000263. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bukowski TP, Chakrabarty A, Powell IJ, Frontera R, Perlmutter AD, Montie JE. Acquired rectourethral fistula: methods of repair. The Journal of Urology 1995;153:730–3. - PubMed
-
- Hechenbleikner EM, Buckley JC, Wick EC. Acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults: a systematic review of surgical repair techniques and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:374–83. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e318274dc87. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Samplaski MK, Wood HM, Lane BR, Remzi FH, Lucas A, Angermeier KW. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing transperineal repair with gracilis muscle interposition for complex rectourethral fistula. Urology 2011;77:736–41. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.009. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Harris CR, McAninch JW, Mundy AR, Zinman LN, Jordan GH, Andrich D, et al. Rectourethral Fistulas Secondary to Prostate Cancer Treatment: Management and Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Combined Experience. The Journal of Urology 2017;197:191–4. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.080. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical