Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Nov:108:1-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Diagnostic performance of multiplex PCR on pulmonary samples versus nasopharyngeal aspirates in community-acquired severe lower respiratory tract infections

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Diagnostic performance of multiplex PCR on pulmonary samples versus nasopharyngeal aspirates in community-acquired severe lower respiratory tract infections

Sylvie Robert et al. J Clin Virol. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: PCR-based techniques for the diagnosis of community- acquired severe lower respiratory tract infections are becoming the standard of care. However, their relative ability to identify either atypical bacteria or viruses that cause LRTI from clinical samples from various sources is yet to be determined.

Objectives and study design: The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic yield of nasopharyngeal aspirates with that of pulmonary samples for the etiological diagnosis of severe acute lower respiratory tract infections by multiplex PCR. Patients were adults with community-acquired pneumonia or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Results: We obtained concordant results for 81 (79%) of the 103 pairs of samples. In 14 of the 22 discordant results, more pathogens were evidenced in the lower respiratory tract samples.

Conclusions: Pulmonary samples had a similar diagnostic sensitivity for virus detection by multiplex PCR as nasopharyngeal aspirates. In contrast, in our study, the diagnostic efficacy of pulmonary samples for Legionella pneumophila over simple aspirates was clearly superior.

Keywords: Community-acquired infections; Respiratory pathogens; multiplex PCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zumla A., Al-Tawfiq J.A., Enne V.I., Kidd M., Drosten C., Breuer J., Muller M.A., Hui D., Maeurer M., Bares M., Mwaba P., Al-Hakeem R., Gray G., Gautret P., Al-Rabeeah A.A., Memish Z.A., Gant V. Rapid point of care diagnosis tests for viral and bacterial respiratory tract infections – needs, advances, and future prospects. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014;14:1123–1135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bouvet D., Gaudy-Graffin C., Garot D., Sunder S., De Gialluly C., Goudeau A. Diagnosis of community-acquired acute respiratory illness: from conventional microbiological methods to molecular detection (multiplex) Pathol. Biol. 2015;63:69–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butt S.A., Maceira V.P., McCallen M.E., Stellrecht K.A. Comparison of three commercial RT-PCR systems for the detection of repiratory viruses. J. Clin. Virol. 2014;61:406–410. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dabish-Ruthe M., Vollmer T., Adams O., Knabbe C., Dreier J. Comparison of three multiplex PCR assays for the detection of respiratory viral infections; evaluation of xTaG respiratory virus panel fast assay, RespFinder 19 assay and RespiFinder SMART 22 assay. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012;12(163) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brittain-Long R., Nord S., Olofsson S., Westin J., Anderson L.-M., Lindh M. Multiplex real-ime PCT for detection of respiratory tract infections. J. Clin. Virol. 2008;41:53–56. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms