Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;14(11):1643-1651.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

Assessment of mammographic breast density after sleeve gastrectomy

Affiliations

Assessment of mammographic breast density after sleeve gastrectomy

Rafael Alvarez et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Mammographic breast density (BD) is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. The effects of bariatric surgery on BD are unknown.

Objectives: To investigate BD changes after sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Setting: University hospital, United States.

Methods: Fifty women with mammograms before and after SG performed from 2009 to 2015 were identified after excluding patients with a history of breast cancer, hormone replacement, and/or breast surgery. Patient age, menopausal status, co-morbidities, hemoglobin A1C, and body mass index were collected. Craniocaudal mammographic views before and after SG were interpreted by a blinded radiologist and analyzed by software to obtain breast imaging reporting and data system density categories, breast area, BD, and absolute dense breast area (ADA). Analyses were performed using χ2, McNemar's test, t test, and linear regressions.

Results: Radiologist interpretation revealed a significant increase in breast imaging reporting and data system B+C category (68% versus 54%; P = .0095) and BD (9.8 ± 7.4% versus 8.3 ± 6.4%; P = .0006) after SG. Software analyses showed a postoperative decrease in breast area (75,398.9 ± 22,941.2 versus 90,655.9 ± 25,621.0 pixels; P < .0001) and ADA (7287.1 ± 3951.3 versus 8204.6 ± 4769.9 pixels; P = .0314) with no significant change in BD. Reduction in ADA was accentuated in postmenopausal patients. Declining breast area was directly correlated with body mass index reduction (R2 = .4495; P < 0.0001). Changes in breast rather than whole body adiposity better explained ADA reduction. Neither diabetes status nor changes in hemoglobin A1C correlated with changes in ADA.

Conclusions: ADA decreases after SG, particularly in postmenopausal patients. Software-generated ADA may be more accurate than radiologist-estimated BD or breast imaging reporting and data system for capturing changes in dense breast tissue after SG.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Breast cancer; Breast cancer risk; Breast density; Dense breast tissue; Diabetes; Glucose metabolism; Mammographic breast density; Mammography; Menopausal status; Metabolic surgery; Postmenopausal; Premenopausal; Sleeve gastrectomy; Weight loss surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Summary of Imaging Outcomes Over Time and Relationship of Weight loss and Hemoglobin A1c with Breast Area, and Absolute Dense Area. BI-RADS density categorization over time (a). Radiologist-estimated and software-calculated BD (b). BA (c) and ADA (d) given by the numbers of 800 μm x 800 μm pixels over time. Linear regression of percent average hemoglobin A1c change and percent change in ADA (e). Linear regression of percent change in BMI to percent change in BA and ADA and percent change in BA to percent change in ADA for entire cohort (f), premenopausal (g), postmenopausal (h), patients with persistent diabetes (i), and patients without or remitted diabetes (j). * indicates statistical significance with p value < 0.05; NS, non-significance; BD, breast density; BA, breast area; ADA, absolute dense area; BMI, body mass index.

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;(219):1–8. - PubMed
    1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Lond Engl. 2014;384(9945):766–781. doi: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steele CB, Thomas CC, Henley SJ, et al. Vital Signs: Trends in Incidence of Cancers Associated with Overweight and Obesity - United States, 2005–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(39):1052–1058. doi: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neuhouser ML, Aragaki AK, Prentice RL, et al. Overweight, Obesity, and Postmenopausal Invasive Breast Cancer Risk: A Secondary Analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(5):611–621. doi: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K. Body Fatness and Cancer — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):794–798. doi: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types