How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening
- PMID: 30196552
- PMCID: PMC6305648
- DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.463
How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening
Abstract
Background: Genomic medicine is rapidly evolving, particularly in the domain of reproduction. Population carrier screening for a range of disorders is becoming possible using whole genome/exome sequencing. However, very little is known about the views of genetically disabled adults toward selective reproduction.
Methods: Forty-three in-depth qualitative interviews were carried out with adults living with different types of genetic condition, recruited through support groups and clinics. Interviews covered participants' experiences of their condition and their views toward genetic intervention in reproduction. Thematic analysis of the data using NVivo 11 was undertaken, and participants were assigned categories as either supporting, not-supporting, or having ambivalent views toward selective reproduction.
Results: The majority of participants (65%) expressed either disapproval of, or held ambivalent views toward, selective reproduction. Key reasons for non-support included regarding genetic impairment as part of personal identity and the prioritization of social and environmental barrier removal. Key reasons for support of selective reproduction included negative and externalizing attitudes toward genetic impairment and a belief in the importance of informed reproductive decision-making.
Conclusion: The degree to which participants identified with their impairment, more so than how they valued it, was significant in determining attitudes toward selective reproduction. Those who supported genetic screening viewed their impairment as separate to themselves, while participants who considered their impairment as integral to their identity were most likely to report ambivalent or negative attitudes. Policymakers and stakeholders considering the role of genetic carrier screening panels might usefully engage with adults affected by heritable disease as well as disability identity politics when considering the acceptability and social impact of genetic screening programs.
Keywords: UK; attitudes; disability; genetic impairment; genetic screening.
© 2018 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Preventing lives affected by hemophilia: A mixed methods study of the views of adults with hemophilia and their families toward genetic screening.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 May;7(5):e618. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.618. Epub 2019 Mar 5. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019. PMID: 30838796 Free PMC article.
-
Which types of conditions should be included in reproductive genetic carrier screening? Views of parents of children with a genetic condition.Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Dec;63(12):104075. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104075. Epub 2020 Sep 30. Eur J Med Genet. 2020. PMID: 33007447
-
Pre- and post-testing counseling considerations for the provision of expanded carrier screening: exploration of European geneticists' views.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0206-9. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 28764782 Free PMC article.
-
Interest in expanded carrier screening among individuals and couples in the general population: systematic review of the literature.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Apr 15;26(3):335-355. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa001. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32099997
-
How does carrier status for recessive disorders influence reproductive decisions? A systematic review of the literature.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019 Dec;19(12):1117-1129. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1690456. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019. PMID: 31709839
Cited by
-
Views of patients and parents of children with genetic disorders on population-based expanded carrier screening.Prenat Diagn. 2022 Aug;42(9):1201-1210. doi: 10.1002/pd.6200. Epub 2022 Jul 9. Prenat Diagn. 2022. PMID: 35734853 Free PMC article.
-
How does the genomic naive public perceive whole genomic testing for health purposes? A scoping review.Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Jan;31(1):35-47. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01208-5. Epub 2022 Oct 19. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023. PMID: 36257982 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical and Practical Considerations in Implementing Population-Based Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening.Genes (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;16(4):423. doi: 10.3390/genes16040423. Genes (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40282381 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability: A mixed-methods study of the views of adults, carriers, and family members living with thalassemia in the UK.J Genet Couns. 2020 Dec;29(6):1026-1040. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1231. Epub 2020 Mar 1. J Genet Couns. 2020. PMID: 32114710 Free PMC article.
-
Gene editing and disabled people: a response to Felicity Boardman.J Community Genet. 2020 Jul;11(3):241-243. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00460-w. Epub 2020 Mar 27. J Community Genet. 2020. PMID: 32221842 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Albers, B. (2018). A friend’s diagnosis leads me to reflect on my SMA past, SMA News Today. Retrieved from https://smanewstoday.com/2018/03/26/sma-upbringing-friends-ms-diagnosis-...
-
- Barter, B. , Hastings, R. , Williams, R. , & Huws, J. (2016). Perceptions and discourses relating to genetic testing: Interviews with people with Down’s Syndrome. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 11,1–12. - PubMed
-
- Boardman, F. (2014b). The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: The experiences of families living with genetic disease. Social Science & Medicine, 107, 18–25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical