Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady state responses (ASSR) in children
- PMID: 30197427
- PMCID: PMC6146583
- DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-1463
Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady state responses (ASSR) in children
Abstract
Hearing threshold identification in very young children is always problematic and challenging. Electrophysiological testing such as auditory brainstem responses (ABR) is still considered the most reliable technique for defining the hearing threshold. However, over recent years there has been increasing evidence to support the role of auditory steady-state response (ASSR). Retrospective study. Forty-two children, age range 3-189 months, were evaluated for a total of 83 ears. All patients were affected by sensorineural hearing loss (thresholds ≥ 40 dB HL according to a click-ABR assessment). All patients underwent ABRs, ASSR and pure tone audiometry (PTA), with the latter performed according to the child's mental and physical development. Subjects were divided into two groups: A and B. The latter performed all hearing investigations at the same time as they were older than subjects in group A, and it was then possible to achieve electrophysiological and PTA tests in close temporal sequence. There was no significant difference between the threshold levels identified at the frequencies tested (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz), by PTA, ABR and ASSR between the two groups (Mann Whitney U test, p < 0.05). Moreover, for group A, there was no significant difference between the ASSR and ABR thresholds when the children were very young and the PTA thresholds subsequently identified at a later stage. Our results show that ASSR can be considered an effective procedure and a reliable test, particularly when predicting hearing threshold in very young children at lower frequencies (including 0.5 kHz).
Stima di soglia mediante potenziali evocati uditivi di stato stazionario in età pediatrica.
Riassunto: Effettuare una stima di soglia in età pediatrica è compito spesso difficile e complesso. A tal proposito, i potenziali evocati uditivi del tronco (ABR) rappresentano ancora la tecnica più affidabile per la definizione di soglia, sebbene il ruolo dei potenziali evocati uditivi di stato stazionario (ASSR) sia stato rivalutato negli ultimi anni. In questo studio retrospettivo sono stati valutati 42 bambini, di età compresa tra 3 e 189 mesi, per un totale di 83 orecchie. Tutti i pazienti inclusi sono risultati affetti da ipoacusia neurosensoriale (≥ 40 dB HL in base alla valutazione click-ABR). Tutti i pazienti sono stati sottoposti ad ABR, ASSR ed audiometria tonale, quest’ultima eseguita appena lo sviluppo psico-fisico del bambino lo ha consentito. I soggetti sono stati suddivisi in due gruppi: gruppo A e B, quest’ultimo ha effettuato tutte le indagini audiologiche quasi nello stesso momento, in quanto i bambini erano più grandi rispetto ai soggetti del gruppo A (in particolare sia le valutazioni elettrofisiologiche che l’audiometria tonale sono state eseguite quasi contemporaneamente). Non sono risultate differenze significative tra i livelli di soglia individuati, alle frequenze testate (0,25, 0,5, 1, 2 e 4 kHz), mediante audiometria tonale, ABR e ASSR, tra i due gruppi (test di U Mann Whitney, p < 0,05 ). Inoltre, considerando i bambini del gruppo A, non si è rilevata alcuna differenza significativa tra le soglie identificate mediante ASSR e ABR rilevate quando i bambini erano molto piccoli, e le soglie di audiometria tonale identificate successivamente. Nella nostra esperienza quindi, i potenziali evocati uditivi di stato stazionario possono essere considerati una metodica efficace ed affidabile soprattutto nella stima di soglia dei bambini molto piccoli e per le basse frequenze (compreso 0.5 kHz).
Keywords: ABR; ASSR; Audiometry; Children; Sensorineural hearing loss.
Copyright © 2018 Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.Ear Hear. 2005 Dec;26(6):559-76. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000188105.75872.a3. Ear Hear. 2005. PMID: 16377993
-
Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Apr;36(2):140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2008.04.009. Epub 2008 Jul 14. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009. PMID: 18620826
-
Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Feb;266(2):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0738-1. Epub 2008 Jun 17. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009. PMID: 18560866
-
[On possible causes of discrepancy between the results of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) recordings].Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2025;90(1):64-68. doi: 10.17116/otorino20259001164. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2025. PMID: 40099337 Review. Russian.
-
Auditory steady-state responses.J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):146-70. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.3.3. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012. PMID: 22436114 Review.
Cited by
-
Hearing loss in very preterm infants: should we wait or treat?Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019 Aug;39(4):257-262. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-2116. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019. PMID: 31501617 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for the Necessity of Objective Hearing Tests in Cochlear Implantation Assessment: Excluding Functional Hearing Loss Cases.J Clin Med. 2025 May 20;14(10):3585. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103585. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40429580 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Aug;276(8):2171-2180. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05451-3. Epub 2019 May 21. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 31115686
-
Benefit of hearing aid use in the elderly: the impact of age, cognition and hearing impairment.Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019 Dec;39(6):409-418. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-2165. Epub 2019 Mar 25. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019. PMID: 30933180 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wrightson AS. Universal newborn hearing screening. Am Fam Physician 2007;75:1349-52. - PubMed
-
- Swanepoel D, Ebrahim S. Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:213-9. - PubMed
-
- Rickards FW, Tan LE, Cohen LT, et al. Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. Br J Audiol 1994;28:327-37. - PubMed
-
- Korczal P, Smart J, Delgrado R, et al. Auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2012;23:146-70. - PubMed
-
- Van Maanen A, Stapells DR. Normal multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to air-conducted stimuli in infants. J Am Acad Audiol 2009;20:196-207. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous