Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 23:12:1527-1532.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S171827. eCollection 2018.

New corneal assessment index from the relational thickness and other OCULUS values (CAIRO Index)

Affiliations

New corneal assessment index from the relational thickness and other OCULUS values (CAIRO Index)

Maged M Roshdy et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to find indices for keratoconus (KC) detection with higher sensitivity and specificity than the currently available ones with the rotating Scheimpflug imaging (Oculyzer I, Pentacam) software.

Patients and methods: Data of 103 normal and 73 KC eyes imaged by Oculyzer I, including slit-lamp examination, refraction, Scheimpflug images, and follow-up data were collected. Logistic regression was done to find new indices with higher area under receiver operating characteristic curves using the currently available ones.

Results: The Corneal Assessment Index from Relational thickness and other OCULUS Values 9 (CAIRO 9) index, deduced from the Ambrosio relational thickness-maximum and the anterior elevation at thinnest point from 9 mm best-fit sphere, and the CAIRO 8, deduced from Ambrosio relational thickness-maximum and anterior elevation at thinnest point from 8 mm best-fit sphere, have a very high area under receiver operating characteristic curves for KC detection (0.997 and 0.995, respectively).

Conclusion: New corneal assessment index is deduced with better sensitivity and specificity for KC detection.

Keywords: elevation; keratoconus; keratoconus diagnosis; keratoconus indices; pachymetry; pentacam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Getting the elevation of the thinnest point on mouse click at this exact point. Abbreviation: BFS, best-fit sphere.
Figure 2
Figure 2
AUROC of CAIRO indices compared with the 4 indices of highest AUROC throughout all cases. Abbreviations: ART-Max, Ambrosio’s relational thickness maximum; CAIRO, Corneal Assessment Index from the Relational thickness and other Oculus values using 9 mm BFS (CAIRO 9) and 8 mm BFS (CAIRO 8); PPI-max, pachymetric progression index maximum; AE, anterior elevation from 9 mm BFS (AE 9) 8 mm BFS (AE 8).
Figure 3
Figure 3
AUROC of CAIRO indices compared with the 4 indices of highest AUROC in differentiating early KC from normal corneas. Abbreviations: ART-Max, Ambrosio’s relational thickness maximum; AUROC, Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic curves; CAIRO, Corneal Assessment Index from the Relational thickness and other Oculus values using 9 mm BFS (CAIRO 9) and 8 mm BFS (CAIRO 8); PPI-max, pachymetric progression index maximum; KC, keratoconus; AE, anterior elevation from 9 mm BFS (AE 9) and 8 mm BFS (AE 8).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rabinowitz YS, Keratoconus RYS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319. - PubMed
    1. Belin MW, Zloty P. Accuracy of the PAR corneal topography system with spatial misalignment. Clao J. 1993;19(1):64–68. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Ophthalmic Procedures Assessment Cornea Panel , Cohen EJ(Chair): Corneal Topography Ophthalmology 19991061628–1638. - PubMed
    1. Belin MW, Khachikian SS, Ambrósio R., Jr . Elevation Based Corneal Tomography. 2nd ed. Panama: Jaypee Highlights Medical Publishers; 2012. Understanding Elevation Based Topography: How Elevation Data is Displayed; pp. 25–46. Clayton.
    1. Ramamurthy S, Reddy JC, Jhanji V. Topography and tomography in the diagnosis of corneal ectasia. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2015;10(3):215–228.

LinkOut - more resources