Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 1:19:e00276.
doi: 10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00276. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Hydrogen peroxide production in a pilot-scale microbial electrolysis cell

Affiliations

Hydrogen peroxide production in a pilot-scale microbial electrolysis cell

Junyoung Sim et al. Biotechnol Rep (Amst). .

Abstract

A pilot-scale dual-chamber microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) equipped with a carbon gas-diffusion cathode was evaluated for H2O2 production using acetate medium as the electron donor. To assess the effect of cathodic pH on H2O2 yield, the MEC was tested with an anion exchange membrane (AEM) and a cation exchange membrane (CEM), respectively. The maximum current density reached 0.94-0.96 A/m2 in the MEC at applied voltage of 0.35-1.9 V, regardless of membranes. The highest H2O2 conversion efficiency was only 7.2 ± 0.09% for the CEM-MEC. This low conversion would be due to further H2O2 reduction to H2O on the cathode or H2O2 decomposition in bulk liquid. This low H2O2 conversion indicates that large-scale MECs are not ideal for production of concentrated H2O2 but could be useful for a sustainable in-situ oxidation process in wastewater treatment.

Keywords: Decomposition; Hydrogen peroxide; Microbial electrolysis cells; Peroxide loss; Pilot tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of a large-scale microbial electrochemical cell (MEC). (A) MEC components, (B) photo of the MEC, (C) anode modulation, and (D) photo of an anode module.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The evolution of current density in the MEC. Red arrows indicate addition of tap water into the cathode due to catholyte evaporation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
H2O2 concentration and H2O2 conversion efficiency in the MEC.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Small-scale H2O2 electrolysis cell performance. Tests were performed in a dual chamber reactor with 10 mL cathode chamber volume using 0.1 M NaCl as electrolyte and the same GDE and AEM as used in the pilot MEC. Cathode potential was fixed at −1.25 V vs SCE. Hydraulic retention time was 0.6, 1.0, and 11.2 min, respectively. The same trends were observed for the cathode potential at −1.5 to −2 V vs SCE (data not shown).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang Y., Angelidaki I. Microbial electrolysis cells turning to be versatile technology: recent advances and future challenges. Water Res. 2014;56:11–25. - PubMed
    1. Lee H.S., Vermaas W.F.J., Rittmann B.E. Biological hydrogen production: prospects and challenges. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:262–271. - PubMed
    1. Cusick R.D., Bryan B., Parker D.S., Merrill M.D., Mehanna M., Kiely P.D., Liu G., Logan B.E. Performance of a pilot-scale continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell fed winery wastewater. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011;89:2053–2063. - PubMed
    1. Gil-Carrera L., Escapa A., Carracedo B., Morán A., Gómez X. Performance of a semi-pilot tubular microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) under several hydraulic retention times and applied voltages. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;146:63–69. - PubMed
    1. Zhang F., Ge Z., Grimaud J., Hurst J., He Z. Long-term performance of liter-scale microbial fuel cells treating primary effluent installed in a municipal wastewater treatment facility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47:4941–4948. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources