What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation
- PMID: 30199497
- PMCID: PMC6132264
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001964
What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation
Abstract
Hypothesis: For experienced adult cochlear implant (CI) users who have reached a plateau in performance, a clinician-guided aural rehabilitation (CGAR) approach can improve speech recognition and hearing-related quality of life (QOL).
Background: A substantial number of CI users do not reach optimal performance in terms of speech recognition ability and/or personal communication goals. Although self-guided computerized auditory training programs have grown in popularity, compliance and efficacy for these programs are poor. We propose that CGAR can improve speech recognition and hearing-related QOL in experienced CI users.
Methods: Twelve adult CI users were enrolled in an 8-week CGAR program guided by a speech-language pathologist and audiologist. Nine patients completed the program along with pre-AR and immediate post-AR testing of speech recognition (AzBio sentences in quiet and in multitalker babble, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant words in quiet), QOL (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults/Elderly, and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale), and neurocognitive functioning (working memory capacity, information-processing speed, inhibitory control, speed of lexical/phonological access, and nonverbal reasoning). Pilot data for these nine patients are presented.
Results: From pre-CGAR to post-CGAR, group mean improvements in word recognition were found. Improvements were also demonstrated on some composite and subscale measures of QOL. Patients who demonstrated improvements in word recognition were those who performed most poorly at baseline.
Conclusions: CGAR represents a potentially efficacious approach to improving speech recognition and QOL for experienced CI users. Limitations and considerations in implementing and studying aural rehabilitation approaches are discussed.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors receive grant funding support from Cochlear Americas for a related investigator-initiated study of clinician-guided aural rehabilitation in newly implanted adult cochlear implant patients.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):699-706. doi: 10.1002/lary.25525. Epub 2015 Aug 8. Laryngoscope. 2016. PMID: 26256441
-
Maximizing Cochlear Implant Outcomes with Short-Term Aural Rehabilitation.J Am Acad Audiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):144-156. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722987. Epub 2021 Apr 22. J Am Acad Audiol. 2021. PMID: 33890268 Clinical Trial.
-
How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?Audiol Neurootol. 2019;24(3):127-138. doi: 10.1159/000500699. Epub 2019 Jul 2. Audiol Neurootol. 2019. PMID: 31266013 Free PMC article.
-
Technologic advances in aural rehabilitation: applications and innovative methods of service delivery.Trends Amplif. 2007 Jun;11(2):101-11. doi: 10.1177/1084713807301321. Trends Amplif. 2007. PMID: 17494876 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adult aural rehabilitation: what is it and does it work?Trends Amplif. 2007 Jun;11(2):63-71. doi: 10.1177/1084713807301073. Trends Amplif. 2007. PMID: 17494873 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly: a uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3089-3094. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05613-3. Epub 2019 Aug 28. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 31463602
-
Exploring neurocognitive factors and brain activation in adult cochlear implant recipients associated with speech perception outcomes-A scoping review.Front Neurosci. 2023 Feb 2;17:1046669. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1046669. eCollection 2023. Front Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 36816114 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive auditory rehabilitation in adults receiving cochlear implants: A pilot study.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Sep 1;5(5):911-918. doi: 10.1002/lio2.442. eCollection 2020 Oct. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33134539 Free PMC article.
-
Contribution of Verbal Learning & Memory and Spectro-Temporal Discrimination to Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.Laryngoscope. 2023 Mar;133(3):661-669. doi: 10.1002/lary.30210. Epub 2022 May 14. Laryngoscope. 2023. PMID: 35567421 Free PMC article.
-
Single-Sided Deafness and Hearing Rehabilitation Modalities: Contralateral Routing of Signal Devices, Bone Conduction Devices, and Cochlear Implants.Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):99. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010099. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 38275519 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Firszt JB, Holden LK, Skinner MW, et al. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear 2004;25(4):375–387. - PubMed
-
- Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurotol 2008;13:193–205. - PubMed
-
- Hast A, Schlücker L, Digeser F, Liebscher T, Hoppe U. Speech perception of elderly cochlear implant users under different noise conditions. Otol Neurotol 2015;36(10):1638–43. - PubMed
-
- Lenarz M, Sönmez H, Joseph G, Büchner A, Lenarz T. Long-term performance of cochlear implants in postlingually deafened adults. Otolaryng Head Neck 2012;147(1)112–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials