Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit
- PMID: 30199498
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001963
Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit
Abstract
Objectives: Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environments. Additionally, the ability to use interaural level differences for sound localization and subjective benefit with the CI were assessed.
Methods: Ten single-sided deaf patients with CI were tested in different loudspeaker configurations with and without the CI. A multi-source noise field (MSNF) with uncorrelated noise from four different directions was used in addition to a setup with the signal from the CI side and noise from the normal-hearing side (SCINNH, azimuth of ±45 degrees). Ten normal-hearing subjects were used as a control for the setup. Speech understanding was measured by an adaptive sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence Test, OLSA) in stationary speech shaped noise and temporally modulated noise to assess the benefit in each listening situation. Sensitivity to interaural level differences was measured in a lateralization experiment. Furthermore, patients completed the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire to assess subjective benefit with the CI.
Results: An overall average benefit in speech reception threshold (SRT) of 1.6 dB (±0.6 dB standard error of the mean [SEM]) was observed in the binaural listening condition (with CI) in all conditions. In the MSNF setup thresholds improved by 0.4 dB (±0.5 dB SEM) and in the SCINNH configuration by 2.7 dB (±0.7 dB SEM). The choice of masking noise effect also had a significant effect on the SRT outcome. The lateralization performance of the SSD users was on a par with the normal hearing group. BBSS scores reflect the overall benefit with the CI apparent in the speech test results.
Conclusion: Patients with single-sided deafness do benefit from a CI in difficult listening environments and are able to localize sound based on interaural level differences. Considering these outcomes, cochlear implantation represents a promising treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness.
Similar articles
-
Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.Hear Res. 2017 May;348:112-119. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 10. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28286233
-
Single-Sided Deafness: Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Perception in Complex Noise and on Auditory Localization Accuracy.Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):e563-e569. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001520. Otol Neurotol. 2017. PMID: 29135878
-
[Analysis of one-year outcomes after cochlear implantation in adults with single-sided deafness].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 7;59(6):602-613. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20231113-00202. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38965850 Chinese.
-
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32194878 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear Implantation in Children With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan 1;147(1):58-69. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.3852. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021. PMID: 33151295 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development of cortical auditory responses to speech in noise in unilaterally deaf adults following cochlear implantation.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0239487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239487. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32976532 Free PMC article.
-
Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology - hearing loss in children - Part II - Treatment.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan-Feb;89(1):190-206. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 26. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36528468 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New Medical Device and Therapeutic Approvals in Otolaryngology: State of the Art Review of 2019.OTO Open. 2020 Jun 2;4(2):2473974X20932506. doi: 10.1177/2473974X20932506. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun. OTO Open. 2020. PMID: 32537556 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Two decades of experience.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Nov 22;4(6):693-702. doi: 10.1002/lio2.331. eCollection 2019 Dec. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 31890890 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of processing-latency induced interaural delay and level discrepancy on sensitivity to interaural level differences in cochlear implant users.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Dec;280(12):5241-5249. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08013-w. Epub 2023 May 23. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 37219685 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous